ReviewNotfall & rettungsmedizin2021
[Executive summary].
Review in Notfall & rettungsmedizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Palliative extubation after ROSC in the emergency setting-a guideline for emergency physicians].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Guideline
- [Regression analysis to calculate the time point of ROSC-A feasibility study].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2026Article
- [Arrival times of emergency services in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-Survival-relevant differences between federal states in Germany].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Article
- Enhancing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality Using a Smartwatch: Neural Network Approach for Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Article
- Metrics of impulsiveness of manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Success rate and duration of orotracheal intubation of premature infants by healthcare providers with different levels of experience using a video laryngoscope as compared to direct laryngoscopy in a simulation-based setting.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- [Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
- [Cardiac arrest under special circumstances].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
- [Adult advanced life support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
- [Basic life support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Informed by a series of systematic reviews, scoping reviews and evidence updates from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, the 2021 European Resuscitation Council Guidelines present the most up to date evidence-based guidelines for the practice of resuscitation across Europe. The guidelines cover the epidemiology of cardiac arrest; the role that systems play in saving lives, adult basic life support, adult advanced life support, resuscitation in special circumstances, post resuscitation care, first aid, neonatal life support, paediatric life support, ethics and education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.