Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34093006›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2021

Management of Persistent Corneal Epithelial Defects with Human Amniotic Membrane-derived Dry Matrix.

Sundas Maqsood, Kareem Elsawah, Navpreet Dhillon, Shady Soliman, Masara Laginaf, Vaishali Lodhia, Damian Lake, Samer Hamada, Mohamed Elalfy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Foxp3Experimental eye research · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sundas MaqsoodCorneo-Plastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital NHS, East Grinstead, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8894-6153
Kareem ElsawahCornea Department, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt.
Navpreet DhillonCorneo-Plastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital NHS, East Grinstead, UK.
Shady SolimanCornea Department, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt.
Masara LaginafEye Department, Maidstone and Turnbridge Wells Hospitals, Maidstone, UK.
Vaishali LodhiaEye Department, Maidstone and Turnbridge Wells Hospitals, Maidstone, UK.
Damian LakeCorneo-Plastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital NHS, East Grinstead, UK.
Samer HamadaCorneo-Plastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital NHS, East Grinstead, UK.
Mohamed ElalfyCorneo-Plastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital NHS, East Grinstead, UK.
Queen Victoria Hospital · GBResearch Institute of Ophthalmology · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report the outcomes of using human amniotic membrane-derived dry matrix (AMDDM) in the management of persistent corneal epithelial defects (PEDs) of various etiologies.

methodsA cohort study of 84 patients age range 7 to 92 years with 93 PEDs were treated with AMDDM (Omnigen

resultsA total of 106 applications of AMDDM were recorded for 81 patients (52 males, 29 females) with a spectrum of different etiologies. Fifty-eight percent of the eyes showed complete healing, and 28% showed partial decrease of the size of PEDs with average treatment length recorded as 22.4±12.3 days. In patients with limbal stem cell deficiency (n=44; aniridia=12, chemical injury=9, Stevens-Johnson syndrome=10), 50% of PEDs showed complete healing and 27% showed partial healing. In patients with microbial keratitis (n=21) (bacterial: 13, fungal: 4, herpetic: 3,

conclusionAMDDM can be easily applied in the clinical setting and has demonstrated its efficiency as a new tool to treat persistent epithelial defects.

Indexed as

amniotic membrane derived dry matrixpersistent epithelial defectssuture less amniotic membrane

Identifiers

PMID34093006
PMCPMC8169046
OpenAlexW3164971372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.