Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34093005›Full record

ArticleArchives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews2021

Multiscale modeling meets machine learning: What can we learn?

Grace C Y Peng, Mark Alber, Adrian Buganza Tepole, William R Cannon, Suvranu De, Salvador Dura-Bernal, Krishna Garikipati, George Karniadakis, William W Lytton, Paris Perdikaris and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A Python toolbox for neural circuit parameter inference.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  16. Assessment of uncertainty quantification in universal differential equations.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Grace C Y PengNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mark AlberUniversity of California, Riverside, USA.
Adrian Buganza TepolePurdue University, Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
William R CannonPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Suvranu DeRensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA.
Salvador Dura-BernalState University of New York, New York, USA.
Krishna GarikipatiUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
George KarniadakisBrown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
William W LyttonState University of New York, New York, USA.
Paris PerdikarisUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Linda PetzoldUniversity of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
Ellen KuhlStanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

StochSS: A Next-Generation Toolkit for Simulation-Driven Biological DiscoveryR01EB014877 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI PETZOLD, LINDA R. · 2012 to 2022
$3.9M
Multi-Scale Laws of Myocardial Growth and RemodelingU01HL119578 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUCCIONE, JULIUS MATTEO, KASSAB, GHASSAN S · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
Multiscale modeling and empirical study of a mechanism limiting blood clot growthU01HL116330 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI ALBER, MARK · 2014 to 2018
$3.5M
Multimodality imaging-driven multifidelity modeling of aortic dissectionU01HL142518 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HUMPHREY, JAY D., KARNIADAKIS, GEORGE · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Long-Term Growth and Remodeling of Skin in Response to StretchR01AR074525 · NIAMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI BUGANZA TEPOLE, ADRIAN · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
Multiscale, Multiphysics Model of Thrombus Biomechanics in Aortic DissectionU01HL116323 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HUMPHREY, JAY D., KARNIADAKIS, GEORGE · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
Microconnectomics of neocortex: a multiscale computer modelU01EB017695 · NIBIB · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI LYTTON, WILLIAM W · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
Multiscale Modeling of Circadian RhythmsU01EB022546 · NIBIB · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI CANNON, WILLIAM R, DUNLAP, JAY C. · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Development and Validation of a Virtual Endoluminal Surgical Simulator (VESS) for Treatment of Colorectal CancerR01CA197491 · NCI · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI DE, SUVRANU · 2016 to 2019
$1.9M
Dissemination of a tool for data-driven multiscale modeling of brain circuitsU24EB028998 · NIBIB · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI DURA-BERNAL, SALVADOR · 2019 to 2023
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197491NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL116323NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL116330NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL119578NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL142518NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074525NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014877NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB017695NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB022546NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB028998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning is increasingly recognized as a promising technology in the biological, biomedical, and behavioral sciences. There can be no argument that this technique is incredibly successful in image recognition with immediate applications in diagnostics including electrophysiology, radiology, or pathology, where we have access to massive amounts of annotated data. However, machine learning often performs poorly in prognosis, especially when dealing with sparse data. This is a field where classical physics-based simulation seems to remain irreplaceable. In this review, we identify areas in the biomedical sciences where machine learning and multiscale modeling can mutually benefit from one another: Machine learning can integrate physics-based knowledge in the form of governing equations, boundary conditions, or constraints to manage ill-posted problems and robustly handle sparse and noisy data; multiscale modeling can integrate machine learning to create surrogate models, identify system dynamics and parameters, analyze sensitivities, and quantify uncertainty to bridge the scales and understand the emergence of function. With a view towards applications in the life sciences, we discuss the state of the art of combining machine learning and multiscale modeling, identify applications and opportunities, raise open questions, and address potential challenges and limitations. We anticipate that it will stimulate discussion within the community of computational mechanics and reach out to other disciplines including mathematics, statistics, computer science, artificial intelligence, biomedicine, systems biology, and precision medicine to join forces towards creating robust and efficient models for biological systems.

Indexed as

biomedicineMachine learningmultiscale modelingphysics-based simulation

Identifiers

PMID34093005
PMCPMC8172124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.