Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34092981›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2021

Association between oral contraceptive use and pancreatic cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Milena Ilic, Biljana Milicic, Irena Ilic

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milena IlicDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia. drmilenailic@yahoo.com.
Biljana MilicicDepartment of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
Irena IlicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies on the association of oral contraceptive (OC) use and pancreatic cancer showed inconsistent findings.

aimTo evaluate the relationship between OC use and pancreatic cancer risk.

methodsA literature search for observational studies (case-control and cohort studies) was conducted up to December 2020. A meta-analysis was performed by calculating pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's chi-square test and

resultsA total of 21 studies (10 case-control studies and 11 cohort studies) were finally included in the present meta-analysis, comprising 7700 cases of pancreatic cancer in total. A significant association was observed between the ever use of OC and pancreatic cancer risk in the overall analysis (RR = 0.85; 95%CI = 0.73-0.98;

conclusionDespite the suggested protective effects of OC use in this meta-analysis, further epidemiological studies are warranted to fully elucidate the association between the use of OC and pancreatic cancer risk.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsAsiaCohort StudiesContraceptives, OralEuropeFemaleHumansContraceptives, OralMeta-analysisOral contraceptivesPancreatic cancerReviewRisk assessmentRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID34092981
PMCPMC8160625
OpenAlexW3164871859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.