Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34092936›Full record

ArticleReviews in fish biology and fisheries2022

Food for all: designing sustainable and secure future seafood systems.

A K Farmery, K Alexander, K Anderson, J L Blanchard, C G Carter, K Evans, M Fischer, A Fleming, S Frusher, E A Fulton and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Experimental evidence of the impact of framing of actors and victims in conservation narratives.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  12. The super wicked problem of ocean health: a socio-ecological and behavioural perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Oceans and society: feedbacks between ocean and human health.Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2022
    Article
  18. Deep aspirations: towards a sustainable offshore Blue Economy.Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

A K FarmeryAustralian National Centre for Ocean Resource and Security, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8938-0040
K AlexanderCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
K AndersonInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Newnham, TAS Australia.
J L BlanchardCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
C G CarterCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
K EvansCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
M FischerCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, St Lucia, QLD Australia.
A FlemingCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
S FrusherCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
E A FultonCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
B HaasCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
C K MacLeodCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
L MurrayCollege of Health, Massey University, Massey, New Zealand.
K L NashCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
G T PeclCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
Y RousseauInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
R TrebilcoCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
I E van PuttenCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
S MauliAustralian National Centre for Ocean Resource and Security, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW Australia.
L DutraCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
D GreenoCollege of Arts, Law and Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
J KaltavaraAustralian National Centre for Ocean Resource and Security, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW Australia.
R WatsonCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
B NowakCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food from the sea can make a larger contribution to healthy and sustainable diets, and to addressing hunger and malnutrition, through improvements in production, distribution and equitable access to wild harvest and mariculture resources and products. The supply and consumption of seafood is influenced by a range of 'drivers' including ecosystem change and ocean regulation, the influence of corporations and evolving consumer demand, as well as the growing focus on the importance of seafood for meeting nutritional needs. These drivers need to be examined in a holistic way to develop an informed understanding of the needs, potential impacts and solutions that align seafood production and consumption with relevant 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This paper uses an evidence-based narrative approach to examine how the anticipated global trends for seafood might be experienced by people in different social, geographical and economic situations over the next ten years. Key drivers influencing seafood within the global food system are identified and used to construct a future scenario based on our current trajectory (Business-as-usual 2030). Descriptive pathways and actions are then presented for a more sustainable future scenario that strives towards achieving the SDGs as far as technically possible (More sustainable 2030). Prioritising actions that not only sustainably produce more seafood, but consider aspects of access and utilisation, particularly for people affected by food insecurity and malnutrition, is an essential part of designing sustainable and secure future seafood systems. Graphic abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11160-021-09663-x.

Indexed as

Blue foodEquityFood and nutrition securityFood systemMaricultureWild capture fisheries

Identifiers

PMID34092936
PMCPMC8164055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.