ArticleHigher education2022
'All things are in flux': China in global science.
Article in Higher education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A bibliometric analysis of research on factors influencing STEM career choices: gender, identity, self-efficacy, and self-concept.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Trends in horizontal gene transfer research inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- China and the U.S. produce more impactful AI research when collaborating together.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mapping the global research landscape on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance: A visualization and bibliometric study.World journal of hepatology · 2024Article
- Review
- Science at risk? Considering the importance of academic freedom for STEM research production across 17 OECD countries.PloS one · 2024Article
- The influence of Chinese scholars on global research.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Reconceptualising international academic mobility in the global knowledge system: towards a new research agenda.Higher education · 2022Article
- Voices of the Costa Rican scientific diaspora: Policy lessons from a decade of experiences from our scientists abroad.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2022Article
- Space and scale in higher education: the glonacal agency heuristic revisited.Higher education · 2022Article
- Evolution and Features of China's Central Government Funding System for Basic Research.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 1990, a large and dynamic global science system has evolved, based on grass roots collaboration, and resting on the resources, infrastructure and personnel housed by national science systems. Euro-American science systems have become intensively networked in a global duopoly; and many other countries have built national science systems, including a group of large- and middle-sized countries that follow semi-autonomous trajectories based on state investment, intensive national network building, and international engagement, without integrating tightly into the global duopoly. The dual global/national approach pursued by these systems, including China, South Korea, Iran and India, is not always fully understood in papers on science. Nevertheless, China is now the number two science country in the world, the largest producer of papers and number one in parts of STEM physical sciences. The paper investigates the remarkable evolution of China's science funding, output, discipline balance, internationalisation strategy and national and global networking. China has combined global activity and the local/national building of science in positive sum manner, on the ground of the nationally nested science system. The paper also discusses limits of the achievement, noting that while China-US relations have been instrumental in building science, a partial decoupling is occurring and the future is unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.