Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34092234›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2021

Personalised nutrition advice reduces intake of discretionary foods and beverages: findings from the Food4Me randomised controlled trial.

Katherine M Livingstone, Carlos Celis-Morales, Santiago Navas-Carretero, Rodrigo San-Cristobal, Hannah Forster, Clara Woolhead, Clare B O'Donovan, George Moschonis, Yannis Manios, Iwona Traczyk and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01530139 (Personalised Nutrition), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01530139 nacompletednot on this map

Personalised Nutrition: An Integrative Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges

TypeinterventionalSponsorNewcastle UniversityRan2012 to 2014Enrolled1,607ConditionsDietary ModificationArmsLevel 1, Level 2, Level 3, Level 0
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Integrative development of a short screening questionnaire of highly processed food consumption (sQ-HPF).The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Goals in Nutrition Science 2025-2030.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Katherine M Livingstone *Human Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, William Leech Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9682-7541
Carlos Celis-Morales *Human Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, William Leech Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Santiago Navas-CarreteroDepartment of Nutrition, Food Science and Physiology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Rodrigo San-CristobalDepartment of Nutrition, Food Science and Physiology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Hannah ForsterUCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland.
Clara WoolheadUCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland.
Clare B O'DonovanUCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland.
George MoschonisDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Yannis ManiosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Iwona TraczykDepartment of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Thomas E GundersenVitas AS, Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway.
Christian A DrevonDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Cyril F M MarsauxDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rosalind FallaizeDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Anna L MacreadyDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Hannelore DanielMolecular Nutrition Unit, Department Food and Nutrition, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Wim H M SarisDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Julie A LovegroveDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Mike GibneyUCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland.
Eileen R GibneyUCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland.
Marianne WalshUCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland.
Lorraine BrennanUCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland.
J Alfredo MartinezDepartment of Nutrition, Food Science and Physiology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
John C MathersHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, William Leech Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. john.mathers@newcastle.ac.uk.
Food4Me Study

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of personalised nutrition advice on discretionary foods intake is unknown. To date, two national classifications for discretionary foods have been derived. This study examined changes in intake of discretionary foods and beverages following a personalised nutrition intervention using these two classifications.

methodsParticipants were recruited into a 6-month RCT across seven European countries (Food4Me) and were randomised to receive generalised dietary advice (control) or one of three levels of personalised nutrition advice (based on diet [L1], phenotype [L2] and genotype [L3]). Dietary intake was derived from an FFQ. An analysis of covariance was used to determine intervention effects at month 6 between personalised nutrition (overall and by levels) and control on i) percentage energy from discretionary items and ii) percentage contribution of total fat, SFA, total sugars and salt to discretionary intake, defined by Food Standards Scotland (FSS) and Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG) classifications.

resultsOf the 1607 adults at baseline, n = 1270 (57% female) completed the intervention. Percentage sugars from FSS discretionary items was lower in personalised nutrition vs control (19.0 ± 0.37 vs 21.1 ± 0.65; P = 0.005). Percentage energy (31.2 ± 0.59 vs 32.7 ± 0.59; P = 0.031), percentage total fat (31.5 ± 0.37 vs 33.3 ± 0.65; P = 0.021), SFA (36.0 ± 0.43 vs 37.8 ± 0.75; P = 0.034) and sugars (31.7 ± 0.44 vs 34.7 ± 0.78; P < 0.001) from ADG discretionary items were lower in personalised nutrition vs control. There were greater reductions in ADG percentage energy and percentage total fat, SFA and salt for those randomised to L3 vs L2.

conclusionsCompared with generalised dietary advice, personalised nutrition advice achieved greater reductions in discretionary foods intake when the classification included all foods high in fat, added sugars and salt. Future personalised nutrition approaches may be used to target intake of discretionary foods.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01530139 . Registered 9 February 2012.

Indexed as

Nutrition PolicyAustraliaBeveragesDietDiet, HealthyFemaleFoodHealth PromotionHumansMaleAdults, Food4MeDiscretionaryDiscretionary foods and beveragesEuropeanInternet-basedInterventionPersonalised nutrition

Identifiers

PMID34092234
PMCPMC8183081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.