Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34092140›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2021

Effectiveness of two types of palliative home care in cancer and non-cancer patients: A retrospective population-based study using claims data.

Markus Krause, Bianka Ditscheid, Thomas Lehmann, Maximiliane Jansky, Ursula Marschall, Winfried Meißner, Friedemann Nauck, Ulrich Wedding, Antje Freytag

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care-an Interim Assessment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Markus KrauseInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9614-3326
Bianka DitscheidInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Thomas LehmannCenter for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Maximiliane JanskyClinic for Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Ursula MarschallBARMER, Wuppertal, Germany.
Winfried MeißnerDepartment of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Friedemann NauckClinic for Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Ulrich WeddingDepartment of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Antje FreytagInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8288-2729
Jena University Hospital · DELMU Klinikum · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEBARMER GEK · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComparative effectiveness of different types of palliative homecare is sparsely researched internationally-despite its potential to inform necessary decisions in palliative care infrastructure development. In Germany, specialized palliative homecare delivered by multi-professional teams has increased in recent years and factors beyond medical need seem to drive its involvement and affect the application of primary palliative care, delivered by general practitioners who are supported by nursing services.

aimTo compare effectiveness of primary palliative care and specialized palliative homecare in reducing potentially aggressive interventions at the end-of-life in cancer and non-cancer.

designRetrospective population-based study with claims data from 95,962 deceased adults in Germany in 2016 using multivariable regression analyses. SETTINGS/

participantsPatients having received primary palliative care or specialized palliative homecare (alone or in addition to primary palliative care), for at least 14 days before death, differentiating between cancer and non-cancer patients.

resultsRates of potentially aggressive interventions in most indicators were higher in primary palliative care than in specialized palliative homecare (

conclusionSpecialized palliative homecare is more strongly associated with reduction of potentially aggressive interventions than primary palliative care in the last days of life. Future research should identify elements of specialized palliative homecare applicable for more effective primary palliative care, too. German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00014730).

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesNeoplasmsTerminal CareAdultGermanyHumansPalliative CareRetrospective Studiesadministrative claimsGermanyhomecare servicespalliative careprimary health carequality of health careretrospective studiesterminal care

Identifiers

PMID34092140
PMCPMC8189010
OpenAlexW3172237301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.