ArticleInternational journal of laboratory hematology2021
Measuring residual anti-Xa activity of direct factor Xa inhibitors after reversal with andexanet alfa.
Article in International journal of laboratory hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid assessment of direct oral anticoagulants in acute stroke-An educational systematic review.European stroke journal · 2025Pooled it
- The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Guideline
- Coagulation assays for assessing the bypassing of factor Xa direct oral anticoagulants using VMX-C001.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Specific reversal agents for direct oral anticoagulants in neurosurgical emergencies - a systematic review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Review
- MAM Domain Containing 2 (MAMDC2) Affects Invasion and Metastasis of Human Gastric Cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2025Article
- The myths behind DOAC measurement: Analyses of prescribing information from different regulatory bodies and a call for harmonization.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2022Article
- Measuring residual anti-Xa activity of direct factor Xa inhibitors after reversal with andexanet alfa.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2021Article
- Differential Neutralization of Unfractionated Heparin and Enoxaparin by Andexanet Alfa.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAndexanet alfa (AnXa) was developed for anticoagulant effect reversal of direct factor Xa inhibitors (DXaI) (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) in emergency situations. Regular anti-Xa assays are not suitable to evaluate anti-Xa activity after AnXa administration because of the high sample dilution resulting in the AnXa-DXaI dissociation which gives inaccurately high DXaI measured concentrations. This study aimed at developing dedicated STA-Liquid anti-Xa test set-ups for accurately measuring DXaI after reversal with AnXa.
methodsModified anti-Xa test set-ups, with reduced sample dilution, were developed to overcome regular assays limitations and to improve measured accuracy with results comparable to Portola microplate reference method used in clinical studies. Both regular and optimized assays were used to measure DXaI concentration in AnXa-containing samples. Quality controls, normal pooled plasma spiked with five DXaI and three AnXa concentrations, samples from DXaI-treated patients spiked with AnXa and ex vivo healthy volunteers having received both DXaI and AnXa were used.
resultsThe lower limit of quantitation of optimized anti-Xa assays was <10 ng/mL with CVs ≤10%. DXaI samples containing 300 ng/mL and 1 µmol/L AnXa resulted in DXaI residual concentrations of 29-72 ng/mL depending on the DXaI (76%-90% reversal), compared to 20-28 ng/mL with reference method (92%-94% reversal) and 135-165 ng/mL with regular assays (about 50% reversal).
conclusionModified test set-ups are automated alternative to reference method with improved precision and reproducibility. They can be run in all laboratories where regular anti-Xa assays are performed using commercially available reagents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.