Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34091905›Full record

ReviewJournal of surgical oncology2021

A review of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection: Disease timelines, relative sensitivities, and test optimization.

Marylin Roque, Kevin Proudfoot, Vadim Mathys, Sophie Yu, Natalie Krieger, Thomas Gernon, Kash Gokli, Stanley Hamilton, Colin Cook, Yuman Fong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Saliva and Anterior Nasal Samples for Detecting Respiratory Viruses in Children.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Saliva as a Biological Fluid in SARS-CoV-2 Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marylin RoqueDepartment of Engineering, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, USA.
Kevin ProudfootDepartment of Engineering, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, USA.
Vadim MathysDepartment of Engineering, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, USA.
Sophie YuDepartment of Engineering, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, USA.
Natalie KriegerDepartment of Engineering, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, USA.
Thomas GernonDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Kash GokliDepartment of Engineering, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, USA.
Stanley HamiltonDepartment of Pathology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Colin CookDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Yuman FongDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8934-9959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testing is an essential part of containment of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. This review summarizes studies for SARS-CoV-2 infection and testing. Nasopharyngeal samples are best at sensitivity detection, especially in early stages of disease and in asymptomatic individuals. Current swab processing involves a 100- to 1000-fold dilution of the patient sample. Future optimization of testing should focus on using smaller volumes of viral transport media and swab designs to increase comfort and increased viral adhesion.

Indexed as

COVID-19 TestingCOVID-19HumansNasopharynxSalivaSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingSputumTime FactorsViral LoadbronchitisCOVID-19pharyngitispneumoniarespiratory infection

Identifiers

PMID34091905
PMCPMC8242677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.