Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34091873›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2021

Intraoperative Monitoring of the Obese Patient Undergoing Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Andrea P Haren, Shrijit Nair, Maria C Pace, Pasquale Sansone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea P HarenDepartment of Anaesthesia, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Dublin, Ireland.
Shrijit NairDepartment of Anaesthesia, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Dublin, Ireland.
Maria C PaceUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Pasquale SansoneUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy. pasquale.sansone@unicampania.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing prevalence of obesity in the population, anaesthetists must confidently manage both the pathophysiological and technical challenges presented in bariatric and non-bariatric surgery. The intraoperative period represents an important opportunity to optimise and mitigate risk. However, there is little formal guidance on what intraoperative monitoring techniques should be used in this population. This narrative review collates the existing evidence for intraoperative monitoring devices in the obese patients. Although a number of non-invasive blood pressure monitors have been tested, an invasive arterial line remains the most reliable monitor if accurate, continuous monitoring is required. Goal-directed fluid therapy is recommended by clinical practice guidelines, but the methods tested to assess this had guarded applicability to the obese population. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

AnesthesiaNeuromuscular BlockadeHumansMonitoring, IntraoperativeObesityPositive-Pressure RespirationIntraoperativeMonitoringObeseObesityPerioperative

Identifiers

PMID34091873
PMCPMC8179704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.