Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34091857›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2021

Residential Medication Management Reviews and continuous polypharmacy among older Australian women.

Kaeshaelya Thiruchelvam, Julie Byles, Syed Shahzad Hasan, Nicholas Egan, Therese Kairuz

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Innovating medication reviews through a technology-enabled process.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kaeshaelya ThiruchelvamUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. kaeshaelyathiruchelvam@uon.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3754-1690
Julie BylesUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3984-6877
Syed Shahzad HasanUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4058-2215
Nicholas EganUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0854-7444
Therese KairuzUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3311-187X
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUIMU University · MYUniversity of Huddersfield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Polypharmacy is an important consideration for the provision of Residential Medication Management Reviews (RMMRs) among older women given their enhanced risk of medication-related problems and admission to residential aged care (RAC). Objectives To determine the prevalence of the use of RMMRs among older women in RAC, and the association between RMMRs and polypharmacy, medications, and costs. Setting Older Australian women aged 79-84 years in 2005 who had at least one Medicare Benefits Schedule and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme record, received a service in aged care, and consented to data linkage. Methods Generalised estimating equations were used to determine the association between polypharmacy and RMMRs, while adjusting for confounding variables. Main outcome measures Prevalence of the use of RMMRs among older women in RAC, association between RMMRs and polypharmacy, medications, and costs. Results Most participants did not have continuous polypharmacy and did not receive RMMRs from 2005 [451 (67.4%)] until 2017 [666 (66.6%)]. Participants with continuous polypharmacy were 17% more likely to receive a RMMR (risk ratio 1.17; 95% confidence interval 1.11, 1.25). Participants in their final year of life and residing in outer regional/remote/very remote Australia were less likely to receive RMMRs. Out-of-pocket medication costs increased over time, and alendronate and aspirin were common contributors to polypharmacy among participants who received RMMRs. Conclusion Polypharmacy was associated with receiving RMMRs and around two-thirds of women who are entitled to a RMMR never received one. There is potential to improve the use of medicines by increasing awareness of the service among eligible individuals, their carers and health care professionals.

Indexed as

Medication Therapy ManagementPolypharmacyAgedAustraliaFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansNational Health ProgramsAged-careMedication reviewMedication useOlder womenPolypharmacyResidential

Identifiers

PMID34091857
OpenAlexW3169795275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.