ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2021
Analyses of the association between cervical cancer and osteoporosis/osteoporotic fracture: a cross-sectional study using KoGES HEXA data.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the association between cervical cancer and the occurrence of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture using data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES).
methodsIn this national cohort study using KoGES health examination (HEXA) data, we extracted data for patients with cervical cancer (n = 493) and control participants (n = 77,571); we then analyzed the occurrence of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture at baseline from 2004 to 2013 and during follow-up from 2012 to 2016. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the odds ratios (ORs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsThe ORs (95% CIs) for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture were 1.49 (95% CI 1.15-1.92, p = 0.03) and 1.06 (95% CI 0.82-1.38, p = 0.634), respectively, in the cervical cancer group. The ORs (95% CIs) for osteoporosis were 2.12 (95% CI 1.14-3.95, p = 0.018) in the ≤ 51-year-old group and 1.43 (95% CI 1.08-1.89, p = 0.011) in the ≥ 52-year-old group of cervical cancer patients.
conclusionWe concluded that Korean women with cervical cancer had a higher risk of osteoporosis than healthy women, but the same finding was not observed for osteoporotic fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34091796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.