Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34091787›Full record

ArticleOecologia2021

Effects of plant species diversity on nematode community composition and diversity in a long-term biodiversity experiment.

Peter Dietrich, Simone Cesarz, Tao Liu, Christiane Roscher, Nico Eisenhauer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter DietrichDepartment of Physiological Diversity, UFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoser Straße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany. peter.dietrich@idiv.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7742-6064
Simone CesarzGerman Centre of Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Tao LiuKey Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Christiane RoscherDepartment of Physiological Diversity, UFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoser Straße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9301-7909
Nico EisenhauerGerman Centre of Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0371-6720
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · DEHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DESouth China Botanical Garden · CN

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FOR 1451Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FZT 118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diversity loss has been shown to change the soil community; however, little is known about long-term consequences and underlying mechanisms. Here, we investigated how nematode communities are affected by plant species richness and whether this is driven by resource quantity or quality in 15-year-old plant communities of a long-term grassland biodiversity experiment. We extracted nematodes from 93 experimental plots differing in plant species richness, and measured above- and belowground plant biomass production and soil organic carbon concentrations (C

Indexed as

NematodaSoilAnimalsBiodiversityBiomassCarbonPlantsCarbonSoilAboveground–belowground interactionsBiodiversity lossPlant–soil interactionsResource qualityResource quantity

Identifiers

PMID34091787
PMCPMC8505370
OpenAlexW3172980077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.