Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34091769›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2021

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on myocardial infarction care.

Timo Schmitz, Christa Meisinger, Inge Kirchberger, Christian Thilo, Ute Amann, Sebastian E Baumeister, Jakob Linseisen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timo SchmitzChair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany. timo.schmitz@med.uni-augsburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3619-0438
Christa MeisingerChair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Inge KirchbergerChair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Christian ThiloDepartment of Internal Medicine I - Cardiology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Ute AmannIndependent Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian E BaumeisterChair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Jakob LinseisenChair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
University of Augsburg · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) care, and to identify underlying stressors in the German model region for complete AMI registration. The analysis was based on data from the population-based KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry located in the region of Augsburg, Germany. All cases of AMI (n = 210) admitted to one of four hospitals in the city of Augsburg or the county of Augsburg from February 10th, 2020, to May 19, 2020, were included. Patients were divided into three groups, namely pre-lockdown, strict lockdown, and attenuated lockdown period. An additional survey was conducted asking the patients for stress and fears in the 4 weeks prior to their AMI. The AMI rate declined by 44% in the strict lockdown period; in the attenuated lockdown period the rate was 17% lower compared to the pre-lockdown period. The downward trend in AMI rates during lockdown was seen in STEMI and NSTEMI patients, and independent of sex and age. The door-to-device time decreased by 70-80% in the lockdown-periods. In the time prior to the infarction, patients felt stressed mainly due to fear of infection with Sars-CoV-2 and less because of the restrictions and consequences of the lockdown. A strict lockdown due to the Covid-19 pandemic had a marked impact on AMI care even in a non-hot-spot region with relatively few cases of COVID-19. Fear of infection with the virus is presumably the main reason for the drop in hospitalizations due to AMI.

Indexed as

Physical DistancingAgedAge FactorsCOVID-19FemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPandemicsProspective StudiesQuarantineRegistriesSARS-CoV-2Sex FactorsAugsburgBavariaCovid-19Door-to-device-timeGermanyLockdownMyocardial infarctionPopulation-based registry

Identifiers

PMID34091769
PMCPMC8179954
OpenAlexW3169210935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.