Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34091761›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2021

Interphase epichromatin: last refuge for the 30-nm chromatin fiber?

Peng Xu, Julia Mahamid, Marco Dombrowski, Wolfgang Baumeister, Ada L Olins, Donald E Olins

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In-cell chromatin structure by Cryo-FIB and Cryo-ET.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Hexasomal particles: consequence or also consequential?Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Chicken Erythrocyte: Epigenomic Regulation of Gene Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peng XuDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Julia MahamidDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Marco DombrowskiDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Wolfgang BaumeisterDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Ada L OlinsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Administration, School of Pharmacy, University of New England, 716 Stevens Avenue, Portland, ME, 04103, USA.
Donald E OlinsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Administration, School of Pharmacy, University of New England, 716 Stevens Avenue, Portland, ME, 04103, USA. dolins@une.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6088-0842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Interphase epichromatin" describes the surface of chromatin located adjacent to the interphase nuclear envelope. It was discovered in 2011 using a bivalent anti-nucleosome antibody (mAb PL2-6), now known to be directed against the nucleosome acidic patch. The molecular structure of interphase epichromatin is unknown, but is thought to be heterochromatic with a high density of "exposed" acidic patches. In the 1960s, transmission electron microscopy of fixed, dehydrated, sectioned, and stained inactive chromatin revealed "unit threads," frequently organized into parallel arrays at the nuclear envelope, which were interpreted as regular helices with ~ 30-nm center-to-center distance. Also observed in certain cell types, the nuclear envelope forms a "sandwich" around a layer of closely packed unit threads (ELCS, envelope-limited chromatin sheets). Discovery of the nucleosome in 1974 led to revised helical models of chromatin. But these models became very controversial and the existence of in situ 30-nm chromatin fibers has been challenged. Development of cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) gave hope that in situ chromatin fibers, devoid of artifacts, could be structurally defined. Combining a contrast-enhancing phase plate and cryo-electron tomography (Cryo-ET), it is now possible to visualize chromatin in a "close-to-native" situation. ELCS are particularly interesting to study by Cryo-ET. The chromatin sheet appears to have two layers of ~ 30-nm chromatin fibers arranged in a criss-crossed pattern. The chromatin in ELCS is continuous with adjacent interphase epichromatin. It appears that hydrated ~ 30-nm chromatin fibers are quite rare in most cells, possibly confined to interphase epichromatin at the nuclear envelope.

Indexed as

ChromatinNucleosomesCryoelectron MicroscopyInterphaseNuclear EnvelopeChromatinNucleosomesCryo-electron tomographyEnvelope-limited chromatin sheetsEpichromatinNucleosomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.