Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34091741›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2021

Evaluation of a novel technique of bladder neck and supramontanal sparing ejaculatory preserving transurethral prostatectomy.

Mohamed Elshazly, Sultan Sultan, Mohamed Shaban, Fouad Zanaty

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06091618 (Laser Vaporization of the Prostate), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06091618 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Laser Vaporization of the Prostate: Comparative Study Between Ejaculatory Preserving and Non-ejaculatory Preserving Technique

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsProstatic HyperplasiaArmsnew technique of ejaculatory preserving laser prostatectomy, conventional technique of laser vaporization of the prostate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed ElshazlyDepartment of Urology, Menoufia University Hospitals, Shebeen el kom, Egypt.
Sultan SultanDepartment of Urology, Menoufia University Hospitals, Shebeen el kom, Egypt.
Mohamed ShabanDepartment of Urology, Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Cairo, Egypt.
Fouad ZanatyDepartment of Urology, Menoufia University Hospitals, Shebeen el kom, Egypt. drfouad80@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2037-9495
Menoufia University Hospitals · EGNasser Institute hospital · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTransurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) can achieve highly satisfying symptomatic and functional outcomes but the loss of antegrade ejaculation represents a major reason for the avoidance of surgical treatment to preserve normal ejaculation and paternity. We present a novel technique to duplicate both bladder neck sparing and supramontanal sparing with resection of apical tissues to improve voiding and antegrade ejaculation.

methodsA prospective study done from June 2018 to June 2020 on 60 consecutive male patients with normal sexual activity diagnosed with benign prostatic enlargement. These patients were randomized into two groups; 30 patients in each group. Group 1 underwent bladder neck and supramontanal sparing ejaculatory preserving transurethral bipolar resection of prostate (ep-TUBRP) and Group 2 underwent classic transurethral bipolar resection of prostate (c-TUBRP). All patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively (after 3 months) using IPSS, Qmax and by IIEF-5.

resultsIn both groups, there were significant improvements 3 months postoperative in Qmax [7.97 mL/s to 18.47 mL/s (group A) and 7.8 to 20.7 mL/s (group B)] and in micturition symptoms according to reductions in IPSS score [24 to 7.5 (group A) and 25 to 8.5 (group B)]. IIEF-5 score improved significantly from a mean of 12.9 to 18.6 (group A) and from 11.6 to 16.4 (group B). Antegrade ejaculation reported in 80% of patients in group A and 27% in group B which was significant (p < 0.001). Postoperative period did not reveal acute urinary retention, stress urinary incontinence, or serious adverse events.

conclusionsOn short-term results, bladder neck and supramontanal ejaculation preserving transurethral bipolar resection of the prostate is superior to classic TURP in preservation of forward ejaculation with comparable efficacy in micturition parameters.

Indexed as

EjaculationAgedGenital Diseases, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTransurethral Resection of ProstateUrinary BladderBladder neck preservingEjaculatory preservingProstatectomySupramontanal Sparing

Identifiers

PMID34091741
OpenAlexW3172919752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.