Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34091696›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

Explicit motor sequence learning after stroke: a neuropsychological study.

Cristina Russo, Laura Veronelli, Carlotta Casati, Alessia Monti, Laura Perucca, Francesco Ferraro, Massimo Corbo, Giuseppe Vallar, Nadia Bolognini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rest the brain to learn new gait patterns after stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  3. Rest the Brain to Learn New Gait Patterns after Stroke.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cristina RussoDepartment of Psychology and Milan Center for Neuroscience-NeuroMi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. c.russo14@campus.unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8493-4972
Laura VeronelliDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Carlotta CasatiLaboratory of Neuropsychology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Alessia MontiDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Laura PeruccaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Francesco FerraroRiabilitazione Specialistica Neuromotoria - Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, ASST "Carlo Poma" di Mantova - Presidio di Riabilitazione Multifunzionale di Bozzolo, Mantua, Italy.
Massimo CorboDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe VallarDepartment of Psychology and Milan Center for Neuroscience-NeuroMi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Nadia BologniniDepartment of Psychology and Milan Center for Neuroscience-NeuroMi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor learning interacts with and shapes experience-dependent cerebral plasticity. In stroke patients with paresis of the upper limb, motor recovery was proposed to reflect a process of re-learning the lost/impaired skill, which interacts with rehabilitation. However, to what extent stroke patients with hemiparesis may retain the ability of learning with their affected limb remains an unsolved issue, that was addressed by this study. Nineteen patients, with a cerebrovascular lesion affecting the right or the left hemisphere, underwent an explicit motor learning task (finger tapping task, FTT), which was performed with the paretic hand. Eighteen age-matched healthy participants served as controls. Motor performance was assessed during the learning phase (i.e., online learning), as well as immediately at the end of practice, and after 90 min and 24 h (i.e., retention). Results show that overall, as compared to the control group, stroke patients, regardless of the side (left/right) of the hemispheric lesion, do not show a reliable practice-dependent improvement; consequently, no retention could be detected in the long-term (after 90 min and 24 h). The motor learning impairment was associated with subcortical damage, predominantly affecting the basal ganglia; conversely, it was not associated with age, time elapsed from stroke, severity of upper-limb motor and sensory deficits, and the general neurological condition. This evidence expands our understanding regarding the potential of post-stroke motor recovery through motor practice, suggesting a potential key role of basal ganglia, not only in implicit motor learning as previously pointed out, but also in explicit finger tapping motor tasks.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansLearningMotor SkillsParesisUpper ExtremityAffected handFinger tapping taskMotor learningStroke

Identifiers

PMID34091696
PMCPMC8282572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.