Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34091197›Full record

ArticlePhysica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)2021

A situational awareness Bayesian network approach for accurate and credible personalized adaptive radiotherapy outcomes prediction in lung cancer patients.

Yi Luo, Shruti Jolly, David Palma, Theodore S Lawrence, Huan-Hsin Tseng, Gilmer Valdes, Daniel McShan, Randall K Ten Haken, Issam Ei Naqa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yi LuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: YL1515@gmail.com.
Shruti JollyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
David PalmaLondon Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Theodore S LawrenceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Huan-Hsin TsengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Gilmer ValdesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Medical Center at Mission Bay, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Daniel McShanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Randall K Ten HakenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Issam Ei NaqaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

TREATMENT VERIFICATION AND TREATMENT PLAN REFINEMENTP01CA059827 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BALTER, JAMES M, LAWRENCE, THEODORE S · 1993 to 2018
$37.9M
Combined radiation acoustics and ultrasound imaging for real-time guidance in radiotherapyR37CA222215 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EL NAQA, ISSAM M. · 2018 to 2024
$3.5M
Optimal Decision Making in Radiotherapy Using Panomics AnalyticsR01CA233487 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EL NAQA, ISSAM M. · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA059827NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233487NCI NIH HHS R37 CA222215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA situational awareness Bayesian network (SA-BN) approach is developed to improve physicians' trust in the prediction of radiation outcomes and evaluate its performance for personalized adaptive radiotherapy (pART).

methods118 non-small-cell lung cancer patients with their biophysical features were employed for discovery (n = 68) and validation (n = 50) of radiation outcomes prediction modeling. Patients' important characteristics identified by radiation experts to predict individual's tumor local control (LC) or radiation pneumonitis with grade ≥ 2 (RP2) were incorporated as expert knowledge (EK). Besides generating an EK-based naïve BN (EK-NBN), an SA-BN was developed by incorporating the EK features into pure data-driven BN (PD-BN) methods to improve the credibility of LC or / and RP2 prediction. After using area under the free-response receiver operating characteristics curve (AU-FROC) to assess the joint prediction of these outcomes, their prediction performances were compared with a regression approach based on the expert yielded estimates (EYE) penalty and its variants.

resultsIn addition to improving the credibility of radiation outcomes prediction, the SA-BN approach outperformed the EYE penalty and its variants in terms of the joint prediction of LC and RP2. The value of AU-FROC improves from 0.70 (95% CI: 0.54-0.76) using EK-NBN, to 0.75 (0.65-0.82) using a variant of EYE penalty, to 0.83 (0.75-0.93) using PD-BN and 0.83 (0.77-0.90) using SA-BN; with similar trends in the validation cohort.

conclusionsThe SA-BN approach can provide an accurate and credible human-machine interface to gain physicians' trust in clinical decision-making, which has the potential to be an important component of pART.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsRadiation PneumonitisAwarenessBayes TheoremHumansAccuracy and credibilityBayesian networksPersonalized adaptive radiotherapySituational awareness

Identifiers

PMID34091197
PMCPMC8284560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.