Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34091194›Full record

ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2021

Simple model of arch support: Relevance to Charcot Neuroarthropathy.

B L Davis, S M Tiell, G R McMillan, L P Goss, J W Crafton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B L DavisCleveland State University, WH 305 I, Washkewicz Hall, 2121 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA. Electronic address: B.L.Davis@csuohio.edu.
S M TiellThe University of Akron, 302 East Buchtel Avenue, Akron, OH 44325, USA.
G R McMillanInnovative Scientific Solutions Inc., 7610 McEwen Road, Dayton, OH 45459, USA.
L P GossInnovative Scientific Solutions Inc., 7610 McEwen Road, Dayton, OH 45459, USA.
J W CraftonInnovative Scientific Solutions Inc., 7610 McEwen Road, Dayton, OH 45459, USA.
Innovative Scientific Solutions (United States) · USCleveland State University · USUniversity of Akron · US

Funding

Detecting Arch Instability in Charcot NeuropathyR41DK125238 · NIDDK · INNOVATIVE SCIENTIFIC SOLUTIONS, INC. · PI CRAFTON, JIM WAYNE · 2020 to 2020
$141k
NIDDK NIH HHS R41 DK125238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCharcot neuropathy is a common complication resulting from poorly controlled diabetes and peripheral neuropathy leading to the collapse, and ultimately the breakdown, of the midfoot. Mechanically, it is likely that a compromised arch support in this, or any other patient group that experiences foot flattening, would be associated with slippage at the distal and proximal interface regions of the plantar surface of the foot and the adjacent support surface. This slippage, although difficult to quantify with standard motion capture systems used in a gait laboratory, could potentially be assessed with systems for monitoring interface shear stresses. However, before investing in such systems, a correlation between arch flattening and interface shear stresses needs to be verified.

methodsFor this purpose, a sagittal plane model of a foot was developed using a multi-body dynamics package (MSC Adams). This model mimicked a subject swaying back and forth, and was constructed to show the dependence of interface stresses on altered arch support.

findingsThe model's predictions matched typical FootSTEPS data: lengthening of the arch of 1-2 mm, sway oscillations of 0.22-0.33 s and frictional force differences (calcaneus relative to forefoot) of 60 N. Of clinical relevance, when the stiffness of the plantar spring (representing aponeurosis and intrinsic muscles) was reduced by 10%, the frictional force difference increased by about 6.5%.

interpretationThe clinical implications of this study are that, while arch lengthening of less than 2 mm might be difficult to measure reliably in a gait lab, using shear sensors under the forefoot and hindfoot should allow arch support to be assessed in a repeatable manner.

Indexed as

FootFoot OrthosesAponeurosisBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansStress, MechanicalArch supportCharcot neuropathyComputational modelDiabetesFoot

Identifiers

PMID34091194
PMCPMC8316300
OpenAlexW3169697125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.