Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34091062›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2021

Facilitating communication for critically ill patients and their family members: Study protocol for two randomized trials implemented in the U.S. and France.

J Randall Curtis, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Lyndia C Brumback, Elizabeth L Nielsen, Kathryn I Pollak, Patsy D Treece, Lisa Hudson, Gigi Garzio, Jennifer Im, Bryan J Weiner and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Time to Talk Money? Intensive Care Unit Clinicians' Perspectives on Addressing Patients' Financial Hardship.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting survival time for critically ill patients with heart failure using conformalized survival analysis.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J Randall CurtisCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: jrc@u.washington.edu.
Nancy Kentish-BarnesAP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Intensive Care Medicine, Famiréa Research Group, Paris, France.
Lyndia C BrumbackDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Elizabeth L NielsenCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Kathryn I PollakDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, United States; Cancer Prevention, Outcomes, and Survivorship Program, Duke Cancer Institute, United States.
Patsy D TreeceCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Lisa HudsonCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Gigi GarzioCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jennifer ImCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Nita KhandelwalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Matthieu Resche-RigonUniversité de Paris, ECSTRRA Team-CRESS-UMR 1153, INSERM and URC Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
Elie AzoulayAP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Intensive Care Medicine, Famiréa Research Group, Paris, France.
Ruth A EngelbergCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
University of Washington · USHôpital Saint-Louis · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRDuke Cancer Institute

Funding

Identifying opportunities to improve shared decision-making about intensity of care for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementiasR01NR018161 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CREUTZFELDT, CLAIRE JOHANNA, ENGELBERG, RUTH ANN · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR018161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritically-ill patients and their families suffer a high burden of psychological symptoms due, in part, to many transitions among clinicians and settings during and after critical illness, resulting in fragmented care. Communication facilitators may help. DESIGN AND

interventionWe are conducting two cluster-randomized trials, one in the U.S. and one in France, with the goal of evaluating a nurse facilitator trained to support, model, and teach communication strategies enabling patients and families to secure care consistent with patients' goals, beginning in ICU and continuing for 3 months.

participantsWe will randomize 376 critically-ill patients in the US and 400 in France to intervention or usual care. Eligible patients have a risk of hospital mortality of greater than15% or a chronic illness with a median survival of approximately 2 years or less. OUTCOMES: We assess effectiveness with patient- and family-centered outcomes, including symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress, as well as assessments of goal-concordant care, at 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-randomization. The primary outcome is family symptoms of depression over 6 months. We also evaluate whether the intervention improves value by reducing utilization while improving outcomes. Finally, we use mixed methods to explore implementation factors associated with implementation outcomes (acceptability, fidelity, acceptability, penetration) to inform dissemination. Conducting the trial in U.S. and France will provide insights into differences and similarities between countries.

conclusionsWe describe the design of two randomized trials of a communication facilitator for improving outcomes for critically ill patients and their families in two countries.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsCommunicationFamilyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID34091062
PMCPMC8429114
OpenAlexW3169109958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.