Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34090724›Full record

ArticleHealth policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

How to make universal, voluntary testing for COVID-19 work? A behavioural economics perspective.

Francesco Fallucchi, Luise Görges, Joël Machado, Arne Pieters, Marc Suhrcke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Estimation of Total Cost Required in Controlling COVID-19 Outbreaks by Financial Incentives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the Impacts of Preventative Health Behaviors with Respect to COVID-19: An Altruistic Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesco FallucchiLuxembourg Institute for Socio-economic Resarch (LISER), Maison des Sciences Humaines, 11 Porte des Sciences, L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Luise GörgesInstitute of Economics, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Germany.
Joël MachadoLuxembourg Institute for Socio-economic Resarch (LISER), Maison des Sciences Humaines, 11 Porte des Sciences, L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Arne PietersIndependent Researcher (currently employed by GFA Consulting Group GmbH).
Marc SuhrckeLuxembourg Institute for Socio-economic Resarch (LISER), Maison des Sciences Humaines, 11 Porte des Sciences, L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg; Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Alcuin Block A, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: marc.suhrcke@liser.lu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testing is widely seen as one core element of a successful strategy to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic and many countries have increased their efforts to provide testing at large scale. As most democratic governments refrain from enacting mandatory testing, a key emerging challenge is to increase voluntary participation. Using behavioural economics insights complemented with data from a novel survey in the US and a survey experiment in Luxembourg, we examine behavioural factors associated with the individual willingness to get tested (WTT). In our analysis, individual characteristics that correlate positively with WTT include age, altruism, conformism, the tendency to abide by government-imposed rules, concern about contracting COVID-19, and patience. Risk aversion, unemployment, and conservative political orientation correlate negatively with WTT. Building on and expanding these insights may prove fruitful for policy to effectively raise people's propensity to get tested.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingEconomicsEconomics, BehavioralHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Behavioural economicsCOVID-19 testingWillingness-to-get-tested

Identifiers

PMID34090724
PMCPMC8450724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.