Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34090524›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2021

A more practical guide to incorporating health equity domains in implementation determinant frameworks.

Eva N Woodward, Rajinder Sonia Singh, Phiwinhlanhla Ndebele-Ngwenya, Andrea Melgar Castillo, Kelsey S Dickson, JoAnn E Kirchner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07102914 (Building Effective Evidence-Based Services at New Haven Adult Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 170 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07102914 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Building Effective Evidence-Based Services at New Haven Adult Education

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled340ConditionsBehavioral Health ChallengesArmsScreening, Brief Intervention and Referral for Treatment (SBIRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Equity in pulmonary rehabilitation delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva N WoodwardCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, North Little Rock, AR, USA. Eva.woodward2@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7880-0054
Rajinder Sonia SinghDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Phiwinhlanhla Ndebele-NgwenyaPhilander Smith College, Little Rock, USA.
Andrea Melgar CastilloGraduate School, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.
Kelsey S DicksonDepartment of Child and Family Development, Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, San Diego State University, San Diego, USA.
JoAnn E KirchnerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Funding

HSRD VA IK2 HX003065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to striking disparities in the implementation of healthcare innovations, it is imperative that researchers and practitioners can meaningfully use implementation determinant frameworks to understand why disparities exist in access, receipt, use, quality, or outcomes of healthcare. Our prior work documented and piloted the first published adaptation of an existing implementation determinant framework with health equity domains to create the Health Equity Implementation Framework. We recommended integrating these three health equity domains to existing implementation determinant frameworks: (1) culturally relevant factors of recipients, (2) clinical encounter or patient-provider interaction, and (3) societal context (including but not limited to social determinants of health). This framework was developed for healthcare and clinical practice settings. Some implementation teams have begun using the Health Equity Implementation Framework in their evaluations and asked for more guidance.

methodsWe completed a consensus process with our authorship team to clarify steps to incorporate a health equity lens into an implementation determinant framework.

resultsWe describe steps to integrate health equity domains into implementation determinant frameworks for implementation research and practice. For each step, we compiled examples or practical tools to assist implementation researchers and practitioners in applying those steps. For each domain, we compiled definitions with supporting literature, showcased an illustrative example, and suggested sample quantitative and qualitative measures.

conclusionIncorporating health equity domains within implementation determinant frameworks may optimize the scientific yield and equity of implementation efforts by assessing and ideally addressing implementation and equity barriers simultaneously. These practical guidance and tools provided can assist implementation researchers and practitioners to concretely capture and understand barriers and facilitators to implementation disparities.

Indexed as

DeterminantFrameworkHealth disparitiesHealth equityImplementationImplementation scienceTheory

Identifiers

PMID34090524
PMCPMC8178842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.