Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34090427›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2021

Equity in newborn care, evidence from national surveys in low- and middle-income countries.

Kimberly Peven, Lindsay Mallick, Cath Taylor, Debra Bick, Louise T Day, Lionel Kadzem, Edward Purssell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Wealth and Education Inequities in Maternal and Child Health Services Utilization in Rural Ethiopia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kimberly PevenFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK. Kimberly.peven@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0047-4084
Lindsay MallickUniversity of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Cath TaylorSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Debra BickWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Louise T DayMaternal and Newborn Health Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lionel KadzemMinistry of Health, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Edward PurssellSchool of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh coverage of care is essential to improving newborn survival; however, gaps exist in access to timely and appropriate newborn care between and within countries. In high mortality burden settings, health inequities due to social and economic factors may also impact on newborn outcomes. This study aimed to examine equity in co-coverage of newborn care interventions in low- and low middle-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.

methodsWe analysed secondary data from recent Demographic and Health Surveys in 16 countries. We created a co-coverage index of five newborn care interventions. We examined differences in coverage and co-coverage of newborn care interventions by country, place of birth, and wealth quintile. Using multilevel logistic regression, we examined the association between high co-coverage of newborn care (4 or 5 interventions) and social determinants of health.

resultsCoverage and co-coverage of newborn care showed large between- and within-country gaps for home and facility births, with important inequities based on individual, family, contextual, and structural factors. Wealth-based inequities were smaller amongst facility births compared to non-facility births.

conclusionThis analysis underlines the importance of facility birth for improved and more equitable newborn care. Shifting births to facilities, improving facility-based care, and community-based or pro-poor interventions are important to mitigate wealth-based inequities in newborn care, particularly in countries with large differences between the poorest and richest families and in countries with very low coverage of care.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealthcare DisparitiesInfant CareAdultAfrica South of the SaharaAsiaFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultHealth equityInfantNewbornPostnatal careSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID34090427
PMCPMC8178885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.