Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34090400›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Views of patients with advanced disease and their relatives on participation in palliative care research.

Karolina Vlckova, Kristyna Polakova, Anna Tuckova, Adam Houska, Martin Loucka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Benefits and Burdens of Research Participation: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review in Palliative and End-of-Life Care.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Palliative medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karolina VlckovaCenter, for Palliative Care, Dykova 15, Prague, 110 00, Czech Republic. k.vlckova@paliativnicentrum.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2004-9656
Kristyna PolakovaCenter, for Palliative Care, Dykova 15, Prague, 110 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-5733
Anna TuckovaCenter, for Palliative Care, Dykova 15, Prague, 110 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6388-1894
Adam HouskaCenter, for Palliative Care, Dykova 15, Prague, 110 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-7425
Martin LouckaCenter, for Palliative Care, Dykova 15, Prague, 110 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9875-7997

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 17-26722Y
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with advanced disease may not be invited to participate in research based on the assumption that participation would be too burdensome for them. The aim of this study was to explore how patients with advanced disease and their relatives evaluate their experience with research participation.

methodThis study used data from two parts of a larger project. The first dataset was a cross-sectional questionnaire study focused on priorities at the end of life. The second dataset used a longitudinal design with structured interviews on prognostic awareness. In both studies, participants evaluated their experience on a 5-point Likert scale and specified their motivation in an open-ended question. Data were collected in 6 hospitals in the Czech Republic with patients with advanced disease and life expectancy less than 1 year and their relatives. Data were analysed using non-parametric tests and thematic analysis.

resultsFirst dataset consisted of 167 patients and 102 relatives, and second dataset consisted of 135 patients and 92 relatives (in total, 496 respondents). Results were similar in both datasets, with half of the sample (53%, 48%) scoring neutral, and over 30% of the sample identified their experience as interesting. The most significant factors associated with the evaluation were religiosity (p = 0.001) and the type of diagnosis (p = 0.04). Motivation for participation was to improve care, support research, express own opinion, opportunity to talk and trusting relationship.

conclusionsPatients with advanced disease and relatives do not mind participating in palliative care research, and it can be even a positive experience for them.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPalliative CareCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyHumansQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesFamilyPalliative carePatientsResearch ethicsResearch participationResearch subjects

Identifiers

PMID34090400
PMCPMC8180046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.