Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34090361›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Assessing service availability and readiness to manage cervical cancer in Bangladesh.

Shagoofa Rakhshanda, Koustuv Dalal, Hasina Akhter Chowdhury, Cinderella Akbar Mayaboti, Progga Paromita, A K M Fazlur Rahman, A H M Eanayet Hussain, Saidur Rahman Mashreky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cervical Cancer Screening Services in Nepal: A Descriptive Crosssectional Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shagoofa RakhshandaCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Koustuv DalalSchool of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden. koustuv.dalal@miun.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7393-796X
Hasina Akhter ChowdhuryCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Cinderella Akbar MayabotiCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Progga ParomitaKirtipasha Health and Family Welfare Centre, Jhalokathi Sadar Upazilla, Bangladesh.
A K M Fazlur RahmanCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
A H M Eanayet HussainDirectorate General of Medical Education, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Saidur Rahman MashrekyCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe second most common cancer among females in Bangladesh is cervical cancer. The national strategy for cervical cancer needs monitoring to ensure that patients have access to care. In order to provide accurate information to policymakers in Bangladesh and other low and middle income countries, it is vital to assess current service availability and readiness to manage cervical cancer at health facilities in Bangladesh.

methodsAn interviewer-administered questionnaire adapted from the World Health Organization Service Availability and Readiness Assessment Standard Tool was used to collect cross-sectional data from health administrators of 323 health facilities in Bangladesh. Services provided were categorized into domains and service readiness was determined by mean readiness index (RI) scores. Data analysis was conducted using STATA version 13.

resultsThere were seven tertiary and specialized hospitals, 118 secondary level health facilities, 124 primary level health facilities, and 74 NGO/private hospitals included in the study. Twenty-six per cent of the health facilities provided services to cancer patients. Among the 34 tracer items used to assess cancer management capacity of health facilities, four cervical cancer-specific tracer items were used to determine service readiness for cervical cancer. On average, tertiary and specialized hospitals surpassed the readiness index cutoff of 70% with adequate staff and training (100%), equipment (100%), and diagnostic facilities (85.7%), indicating that they were ready to manage cervical cancer. The mean RI scores for the rest of the health facilities were below the cutoff value, meaning that they were not prepared to provide adequate cervical cancer services.

conclusionThe health facilities in Bangladesh (except for some tertiary hospitals) lack readiness in cervical cancer management in terms of guidelines on diagnosis and treatment, training of staff, and shortage of equipment. Given that cervical cancer accounts for more than one-fourth of all female cancers in Bangladesh, management of cervical cancer needs to be available at all levels of health facilities, with primary level facilities focusing on early diagnosis. It is recommended that appropriate standard operating procedures on cervical cancer be developed for each level of health facilities to contribute towards attaining sustainable developmental goals.

Indexed as

BangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHospitalsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Sustainable DevelopmentUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBangladeshCervical cancerService availability and readiness assessmentWHO SARA

Identifiers

PMID34090361
PMCPMC8180145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.