Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34090205›Full record

ArticleEnvironment international2021

Biomonitoring of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) among hairdressers in salons primarily serving women of color: A pilot study.

Lydia M Louis, Lucy K Kavi, Meleah Boyle, Walkiria Pool, Deepak Bhandari, Víctor R De Jesús, Stephen Thomas, Anna Z Pollack, Angela Sun, Seyrona McLean and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 1,3-Butadiene: a ubiquitous environmental mutagen and its associations with diseases.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lydia M LouisJohns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health & Engineering, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lucy K KaviMaryland Institute of Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Meleah BoyleMaryland Institute of Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Walkiria PoolCentro de Apoyo Familiar, Hyattsville, MD, USA.
Deepak BhandariTobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Víctor R De JesúsTobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Stephen ThomasUniversity of Maryland, School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA; Maryland Center for Health Equity, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Anna Z PollackDepartment of Global and Community Health, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Angela SunMaryland Center for Health Equity, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Seyrona McLeanMaryland Center for Health Equity, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Ana M RuleJohns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health & Engineering, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lesliam Quirós-AlcaláJohns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health & Engineering, Baltimore, MD, USA; Maryland Institute of Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. Electronic address: lquiros@jhu.edu.
University of Maryland, College Park · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USJohns Hopkins University · USGeorge Mason University · USHyattsville Community Development Corporation · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Targeted Research Training CoreT42OH008428 · OH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RAMACHANDRAN, GURUMURTHY · 2005 to 2025
$31.1M
Traning Program in Environmental Health SciencesT32ES007141 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Marsha Wills-Karp · 1985 to 2026
$22.2M
Antimicrobial Agents and Asthma Morbidity among African American Children withAsthmaK01HL138124 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI QUIROS-ALCALA, LESLIAM · 2017 to 2021
$666k
ACL HHS T42OH008428NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL138124NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007141NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hairdressers are exposed to volatile organic compounds (VOCs), many of which have been linked to acute and chronic health effects. Those hairdressers serving an ethnic clientele may potentially experience disproportionate exposures from frequent use of products containing VOCs or different VOC concentrations contained in products which are marketed to the specific needs of their clientele. However, no biomonitoring studies have investigated occupational exposures in this population. In the present pilot study, we sought to characterize concentrations and exposure determinants for 28 VOC biomarkers in post-shift urine samples among 23 hairdressers primarily serving an ethnic clientele. VOC biomarker concentrations among hairdressers of color were compared to concentrations among a comparison group of 17 office workers and a representative sample of women participating in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. VOC biomarkers were detected in all hairdressers with higher concentrations observed among hairdressers serving a predominantly Black versus Latino clientele, and among hairdressers overall versus office workers and women in the U.S. general population. Median biomarker concentrations for acrolein,1,3-butadiene, and xylene in hairdressers were more than twice as high as those observed among office workers. Median concentrations for 1-bromopropane, acrolein and 1,3-butadiene were more than four times higher among all hairdressers compared to those reported among women in the U.S. general population. Select salon services (e.g., sister locs, flat ironing, permanent hair coloring, permanent waves or texturizing, Brazilian blowout or keratin treatment, etc.) were also associated with higher VOC biomarker concentrations among hairdressers. This pilot study represents the first biomonitoring analysis to characterize VOC exposures among women hairdressers of color and to provide evidence that this occupational population may experience elevated VOC exposures compared to women in the U.S. general population. Results from our study represent an important first step in elucidating occupational VOC exposures in this understudied occupational group. Larger studies among a racially and ethnically diverse cohort of hairdressers are warranted to confirm our findings and inform future exposure interventions in this understudied occupational population.

Indexed as

Beauty CultureOccupational ExposureVolatile Organic CompoundsBiological MonitoringBlack or African AmericanBrazilEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansNutrition SurveysPilot ProjectsVolatile Organic CompoundsBlackHairdressersHair salonLatinoPersonal care productsVolatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Identifiers

PMID34090205
PMCPMC8221536
OpenAlexW3171252179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.