ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2021
Comparison of texture-based classification and deep learning for plantar soft tissue histology segmentation.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Diabetic Plantar Foot Segmentation in Active Thermography Using a Two-Stage Adaptive Gamma Transform and a Deep Neural Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Histomorphological measurements can be used to identify microstructural changes related to disease pathomechanics, in particular, plantar soft tissue changes with diabetes. However, these measurements are time-consuming and susceptible to sampling and human measurement error. We investigated two approaches to automate segmentation of plantar soft tissue stained with modified Hart's stain for elastin with the eventual goal of subsequent morphological analysis. The first approach used multiple texture- and color-based features with tile-wise classification. The second approach used a convolutional neural network modified from the U-Net architecture with fewer channel dimensions and additional downsampling steps. A hybrid color and texture feature, Fourier reduced histogram of uniform improved opponent color local binary patterns (f-IOCLBP), yielded the best feature-based segmentation, but still performed 3.6% worse on average than the modified U-Net. The texture-based method was sensitive to changes in illumination and stain intensity, and segmentation errors were often in large regions of single tissues or at tissue boundaries. The U-Net was able to segment small, few-pixel tissue boundaries, and errors were often trivial to clean up with post-processing. A U-Net approach outperforms hand-crafted features for segmentation of plantar soft tissue stained with modified Hart's stain for elastin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.