Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34089503›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2021

Circulating Tumour DNA as a Potential Cost-Effective Biomarker to Reduce Adjuvant Chemotherapy Overtreatment in Stage II Colorectal Cancer.

Yat Hang To, Koen Degeling, Suzanne Kosmider, Rachel Wong, Margaret Lee, Catherine Dunn, Grace Gard, Azim Jalali, Vanessa Wong, Maarten IJzerman and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yat Hang ToPersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia. To.YatHang@mh.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1497-1700
Koen DegelingCancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Suzanne KosmiderDepartment of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rachel WongPersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Margaret LeePersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Catherine DunnPersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Grace GardPersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Azim JalaliPersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Vanessa WongPersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Maarten IJzermanCancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Peter GibbsPersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Jeanne TiePersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveSubstantial adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) overtreatment for stage II colorectal cancer results in a health and financial burden. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can improve patient selection for AC by detecting micro-metastatic disease. We estimated the health economic potential of ctDNA-guided AC for stage II colorectal cancer.

methodsA cost-utility analysis was performed to compare ctDNA-guided AC to standard of care, where 22.6% of standard of care patients and all ctDNA-positive patients (8.7% of tested patients) received AC and all ctDNA-negative patients (91.3%) did not. A third preference-sensitive ctDNA strategy was included where 6.8% of ctDNA-negative patients would receive AC. A state-transition model was populated using data from a prospective cohort study and clinical registries. Health and economic outcomes were discounted at 5% over a lifetime horizon from a 2019 Australian payer perspective. Extensive scenario and probabilistic analyses quantified model uncertainty.

resultsCompared to standard of care, the ctDNA and preference-sensitive ctDNA strategies increased quality-adjusted life-years by 0.20 (95% confidence interval - 0.40 to 0.81) and 0.19 (- 0.40 to 0.78), and resulted in incremental costs of AUD - 4055 (- 16,853 to 8472) and AUD - 2284 (- 14,685 to 10,116), respectively. Circulating tumour DNA remained cost effective at a willingness to pay of AUD 20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained throughout most scenario analyses in which the proportion of ctDNA-positive patients cured by AC and compliance to a ctDNA-negative test results were decreased.

conclusionsCirculating tumour-guided AC is a potentially cost-effective strategy towards reducing overtreatment in stage II colorectal cancer. Results from ongoing randomised clinical studies will be important to reduce uncertainty in the estimates.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsAustraliaBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMedical OveruseProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.