Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34089500›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Mucosa plication reinforced colorectal anastomosis and trans-anal vacuum drainage: a pilot study with preliminary results.

Alexander Ferko, Juraj Váňa, Marek Adámik, Adam Švec, Michal Žáček, Michal Demeter, Marián Grendár

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04735107 (Low Anterior Resection Combined With Transanal Reinforcement and Endoluminal Sponge Vacuum Drainage), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04735107 naunknown statusnot on this map

Low Anterior Resection Combined With Transanal Reinforcement and Endoluminal Sponge Vacuum Drainage

TypeinterventionalSponsorComenius UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsRectal CancerArmscolorectal anastomosis reinforcement and trans-anal drainage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander FerkoDepartment of Surgery and Transplant Centre, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovak Republic. a.ferko@seznam.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3031-1400
Juraj VáňaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty Hospital Žilina, Žilina, Slovak Republic.
Marek AdámikDepartment of Surgery and Transplant Centre, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovak Republic.
Adam ŠvecDepartment of Surgery and Transplant Centre, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovak Republic.
Michal ŽáčekDepartment of Surgery, Faculty Hospital Žilina, Žilina, Slovak Republic.
Michal DemeterDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovak Republic.
Marián GrendárLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Biomedical Center Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovak Republic.
Comenius University Bratislava · SKUniversity of Žilina · SKUniversity Hospital Hradec Králové · CZ

Funding

Ministry of Health Care, Slovak Republic No2018/16-UKMT-12.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dehiscence of colorectal anastomosis is a serious complication that is associated with increased mortality, impaired functional and oncological outcomes. The hypothesis was that anastomosis reinforcement and vacuum trans-anal drainage could eliminate some risk factors, such as mechanically stapled anastomosis instability and local infection. Patients with rectal cancer within 10 cm of the anal verge and low anterior resection with double-stapled technique were included consecutively. A stapler anastomosis was supplemented by trans-anal reinforcement and vacuum drainage using a povidone-iodine-soaked sponge. Modified reinforcement using a circular mucosa plication was developed and used. Patients were followed up by postoperative endoscopy and outcomes were acute leak rate, morbidity, and diversion rate. The procedure was successfully completed in 52 from 54 patients during time period January 2019-October 2020. The mean age of patients was 61 years (lower-upper quartiles 54-69 years). There were 38/52 (73%) males and 14/52 (27%) females; the neoadjuvant radiotherapy was indicated in a group of patients in 24/52 (46%). The mean level of anastomosis was 3.8 cm (lower-upper quartiles 3.00-4.88 cm). The overall morbidity was 32.6% (17/52) and Clavien-Dindo complications ≥ 3 grade appeared in 3/52 (5.7%) patients. No loss of anastomosis was recorded and no patient died postoperatively. The symptomatic anastomotic leak was recorded in 2 (3.8%) patients and asymptomatic blind fistula was recorded in one patient 1/52 (1.9%). Diversion ileostomy was created in 1/52 patient (1.9%). Reinforcement of double-stapled anastomosis using a circular mucosa plication with combination of vacuum povidone-iodine-soaked sponge drainage led to a low acute leak and diversion rate. This pilot study requires further investigation.Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.: Trial registration number is NCT04735107, date of registration February 2, 2021, registered retrospectively.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsRectumAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakDrainageFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMucous MembranePilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesVacuumAnastomotic dehiscenceLow anterior resectionRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34089500
PMCPMC8606370
OpenAlexW3165302222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.