ArticleMycopathologia2021
Interaction Between Amorolfine and Voriconazole Against Fusarium species.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic Antibacterial Activity of Amorolfine Combined with Colistin AgainstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Pandemic Response Box® library as a source of antifungal drugs against Scedosporium and Lomentospora species.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fusarium species represent a range of fungal pathogens capable of causing diverse mycotic diseases. Relative to antibacterial drugs, few effective antifungal agents have been developed to date, and all are subject to significant limitations. As such, there is an urgent need to design novel antifungal treatments for infections caused by Fusarium spp. Herein, 15 clinical isolates, including 5 Fusarium oxysporum and 10 Fusarium solani strains, were analyzed to explore the relative inhibitory effects of different combinations of amorolfine (AMO) and voriconazole (VOR) on the growth of these fungal pathogens. These analyses were conducted by measuring minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for these antifungal agents in a broth microdilution assay and by using an in vivo model of Fusarium-infected Galleria mellonella. These experiments revealed that in isolation, AMO and VOR exhibited MIC values ranging from 4 to 16 μg/mL and 2 to 8 μg/mL, respectively. However, these effective MIC values fell to 1-2 μg/mL and 0.5-2 μg/mL, respectively, when AMO and VOR were administered in combination with one another, exhibiting synergistic activity against 73.3% of analyzed Fusarium strains. Subsequent in vivo analyses conducted using the G. mellonella model further confirmed that combination VOR + AMO treatment was associated with significantly improved larval survival following Fusarium spp. infection. Together, these results serve as the first published evidence demonstrating that VOR and AMO exhibit synergistic activity against infections caused by Fusarium spp., indicating that they may represent an effective approach to antifungal disease treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.