Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34089353›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Anxiety is associated with unfulfilled information needs and pain at the informed consent consultation of spine surgery patients: a longitudinal study.

Sabine Fischbeck, Katja Petrowski, Mirjam Renovanz, Rebecca Nesbigall, Julian Haaf, Florian Ringel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Patients' experience on waiting for spinal arthrodesis: a qualitative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine FischbeckKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Saarstr. 21, 55099, Mainz, Germany. fischbec@uni-mainz.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6493-7300
Katja PetrowskiKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Saarstr. 21, 55099, Mainz, Germany.
Mirjam RenovanzInterdisziplinäre Sektion Neuroonkologie, Zentrum für Neurologie & Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hertie-Institut für Klinische Hirnforschung, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Rebecca NesbigallKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Saarstr. 21, 55099, Mainz, Germany.
Julian HaafKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Saarstr. 21, 55099, Mainz, Germany.
Florian RingelKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMeeting the information needs of patients adequately is of high importance in informed consent consultations in surgery. However, information needs often remain unmet in the informed consent consultation. The aim of this study was to assess anxiety and pain in relation to the patients' information needs fulfillment perioperatively.

methodsWe applied a question prompt list (QPL) for patients undergoing spine surgery (SN-QPL) before (t1) and a question answering list (SN-QAL) after (t2) the informed consent consultation. The patients additionally completed the "State-Trait Anxiety Operation Inventory" (STOA, cognitive and affective scale) at t1, as well as a pain numerical rating scale (NRS) at t2 and postoperative (t3). We analyzed (1) the association between anxiety, information needs and pain and (2) anxiety and pain scores regarding information needs fulfillment after the consent consultation.

resultsA total of n = 118 patients was included. Affective and cognitive state anxiety was only reduced postoperatively (affective p < .001, cognitive p < .05). The higher trait anxiety was, the more patients longed for information at t1-t3 (t1: r = .58/r = .74, each p < .001), (t2: r = .38/r = .49, each p < .001) and (t3: r = .29, p < .01/r = 34, p < .001). Higher grades of trait anxiety resulted in lower information needs fulfilment. Higher state anxiety levels were associated with higher pain levels. Information needs more often remained unfulfilled in high trait and state anxiety patients.

conclusionPatients' anxiety was associated with (un)fulfilled information needs. Meeting information needs should be optimized in the process of surgeon-patient communication. Adapting the information to the patients' anxiety levels seem to be an effective way to reduce anxiety.

Indexed as

AnxietyInformed ConsentHumansLongitudinal StudiesPainReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesInformation needsPainQuestion prompt listSpine surgeryState and trait anxiety

Identifiers

PMID34089353
OpenAlexW3164230229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.