Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34089289›Full record

ArticleAging cell2021

Human muscle stem cells are refractory to aging.

James S Novak, Davi A G Mázala, Marie Nearing, Ravi Hindupur, Prech Uapinyoying, Nayab F Habib, Tessa Dickson, Olga B Ioffe, Brent T Harris, Marie N Fidelia-Lambert and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  9. Identification of Subproteomic Markers for Skeletal Muscle Profiling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Cilia, Centrosomes and Skeletal Muscle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

James S NovakCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9989-8724
Davi A G MázalaCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Marie NearingCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Ravi HindupurCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Prech UapinyoyingCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Nayab F HabibCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Tessa DicksonCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Olga B IoffeDepartment of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brent T HarrisDepartment of Neurology and Pathology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Marie N Fidelia-LambertDepartment of Pathology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Christopher T RossiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
D Ashely HillDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Kathryn R WagnerThe Hugo W. Moser Research Institute, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eric P HoffmanCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Terence A PartridgeCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Children's National · USBinghamton University · USGeorgetown University · USHoward University Hospital · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Research_ProjectU54HD090257 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VITTORIO GALLO, VITTORIO GALLO VITTORIO GALLO · 2016 to 2020
$5.9M
Genetics and Genomics of Muscle Postdoctoral Training ProgramT32AR056993 · NIAMS · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI JAISWAL, JYOTI K, PARTRIDGE, TERENCE A · 2010 to 2019
$2.2M
Cellular and genomic measures of stem cell function in age-related human muscle atrophyR21AG051260 · NIA · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PARTRIDGE, TERENCE A · 2016 to 2017
$481k
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR056993NIA NIH HHS R21 AG051260NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related loss of muscle mass and strength is widely attributed to limitation in the capacity of muscle resident satellite cells to perform their myogenic function. This idea contains two notions that have not been comprehensively evaluated by experiment. First, it entails the idea that we damage and lose substantial amounts of muscle in the course of our normal daily activities. Second, it suggests that mechanisms of muscle repair are in some way exhausted, thus limiting muscle regeneration. A third potential option is that the aged environment becomes inimical to the conduct of muscle regeneration. In the present study, we used our established model of human muscle xenografting to test whether muscle samples taken from cadavers, of a range of ages, maintained their myogenic potential after being transplanted into immunodeficient mice. We find no measurable difference in regeneration across the range of ages investigated up to 78 years of age. Moreover, we report that satellite cells maintained their myogenic capacity even when muscles were grafted 11 days postmortem in our model. We conclude that the loss of muscle mass with increasing age is not attributable to any intrinsic loss of myogenicity and is most likely a reflection of progressive and detrimental changes in the muscle microenvironment such as to disfavor the myogenic function of these cells.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceSatellite Cells, Skeletal MuscleXenograft Model Antitumor Assaysaginghuman satellite cellsmuscle regenerationmyogenic capacitysarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID34089289
PMCPMC8282247
OpenAlexW3164552082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.