Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34089145›Full record

ReviewNeurology and therapy2021

Efficacy and Safety of Medication for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents with Common Comorbidities: A Systematic Review.

Noa Tsujii, Masahide Usami, Noriyuki Naya, Toshinaga Tsuji, Hirokazu Mishima, Junko Horie, Masakazu Fujiwara, Junzo Iida

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Noa Tsujii *Department of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan. tujiinoa@med.kindai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3434-6280
Masahide Usami *Kohnodai Hospital, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Noriyuki NayaMedical Affairs Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1879-3603
Toshinaga TsujiMedical Affairs Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3685-0763
Hirokazu MishimaMedical Affairs Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Junko HorieMedical Affairs Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Masakazu FujiwaraData Science Office, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Junzo IidaFaculty of Nursing, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Shionogi (Japan) · JPKindai University · JPNara Medical University · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComorbid psychiatric conditions in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) occur frequently, complicate management, and are associated with substantial burden on patients and caregivers. Very few systematic reviews have assessed the efficacy and safety of medications for ADHD in children and adolescents with comorbidities. Of those that were conducted, most focused on a particular comorbidity or medication. In this systematic literature review, we summarize the efficacy and safety of treatments for children and adolescents with ADHD and comorbid autism spectrum disorders, oppositional defiant disorder, Tourette's disorder and other tic disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov (to October 2019) for studies of patients (aged < 18 years) with an ADHD diagnosis and the specified comorbidities treated with amphetamines, methylphenidate and derivatives, atomoxetine (ATX), and guanfacine extended-release (GXR). For efficacy, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or meta-analyses of RCTs were eligible for inclusion; for safety, all study types were eligible. The primary efficacy outcome measure was ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score.

resultsOf 2177 publications/trials retrieved, 69 were included in this systematic literature review (5 meta-analyses, 37 placebo-controlled RCTs, 16 cohort studies, 11 case reports). A systematic narrative synthesis is provided because insufficient data were retrieved to combine ADHD-RS-IV total scores or effect sizes. Effect sizes for ADHD-RS-IV total scores were available for ten RCTs and ranged from 0.46 to 1.0 for ATX and from 0.92 to 2.0 for GXR across comorbidities. The numbers and types of adverse events in children with comorbidities were consistent with those in children without comorbidities, but treatment should be individualized to ensure children can tolerate the lowest effective dose.

conclusionLimited information is available from placebo-controlled RCTs on the efficacy (by ADHD-RS-IV) or safety of medication in children with ADHD and psychiatric comorbidities. Further studies are required to support evidence-based drug selection for these populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderChildComorbidityPharmacotherapies

Identifiers

PMID34089145
PMCPMC8571469
OpenAlexW3164754547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.