Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34089102›Full record

ReviewBrain structure & function2021

The role of feedback projections in feature tuning and neuronal excitability in the early primate visual system.

A R A Correia, A K J Amorim, J G M Soares, B Lima, M Fiorani, R Gattass

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A R A CorreiaInstituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-900, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3434-3223
A K J AmorimInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Do Pará, Belém, PA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4207-9138
J G M SoaresInstituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-900, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0408-8607
B LimaInstituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-900, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6865-2900
M FioraniInstituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-900, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0579-7632
R GattassInstituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-900, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. rgattass@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0321-1490
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal do Pará · BR

Funding

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos FINEP 0354/16Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/210.917/2016 - PRONEX
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A general assumption in visual neuroscience is that basic receptive field properties such as orientation and direction selectivity are constructed within intrinsic neuronal circuits and feedforward projections. In addition, it is assumed that general neuronal excitability and responsiveness in early visual areas is to a great extent independent of feedback input originating in areas higher in the stream. Here, we review the contribution of feedback projections from MT, V4 and pulvinar to the receptive field properties of V2 neurons in the anesthetized and paralyzed monkey. Importantly, our results contradict both of these assumptions. We separately inactivated each of these three brain regions using GABA pressure injections, while simultaneously recording V2 single unit activity before and hours after inactivation. Recordings and GABA injections were carried out in topographically corresponding regions of the visual field. We outline the changes in V2 activity, responsiveness and receptive field properties for early, mid and late post-injection phases. Immediately after injection, V2 activity is globally suppressed. Subsequently, there is an increase in stimulus-driven relative to spontaneous neuronal activity, which improves the signal-to-noise coding for the oriented moving bars. Notably, V2 tuning properties change substantially relative to its pre-injection selectivity profile. The resulting increase or decrease in selectivity could not be readily predicted based on the selectivity profile of the inactivated site. Finally, V2 activity rebounds before returning to it pre-injection profile Our results show that feedback projections profoundly impact neuronal circuits in early visual areas, and may have been heretofore largely underestimated in their physiological role.

Indexed as

gamma-Aminobutyric AcidNeuronsAnimalsFeedbackPhotic StimulationPrimatesVisual Pathwaysgamma-Aminobutyric AcidArea V2Feature tuningFeedback projectionsGABA inactivationPrimate visual system

Identifiers

PMID34089102
OpenAlexW3165298023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.