ArticleNature protocols2021
Probing low-copy-number proteins in single living cells using single-cell plasmonic immunosandwich assays.
Article in Nature protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Artificial Antibody-Based Toolbox Accelerates Validation of Hidden Microproteins Encoded by the Dark Genome.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Review
- Molecular robotic agents that survey molecular landscapes for information retrieval.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Recent advancements in single-cell metabolic analysis for pharmacological research.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Review
- Super-Long SERS Active Single Silver Nanowires for Molecular Imaging in 2D and 3D Cell Culture Models.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Chiral molecular imprinting-based SERS detection strategy for absolute enantiomeric discrimination.Nature communications · 2022Article
- MIMAS: microfluidic platform in tandem with MALDI mass spectrometry for protein quantification from small cell ensembles.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular heterogeneity is pervasive and of paramount importance in biology. Single-cell analysis techniques are indispensable for understanding the heterogeneity and functions of cells. Low-copy-number proteins (fewer than 1,000 molecules per cell) perform multiple crucial functions such as gene expression, cellular metabolism and cell signaling. The expression level of low-copy-number proteins of individual cells provides key information for the in-depth understanding of biological processes and diseases. However, the quantitative analysis of low-copy-number proteins in a single cell still remains challenging. To overcome this, we developed an approach called single-cell plasmonic immunosandwich assay (scPISA) for the quantitative measurement of low-copy-number proteins in single living cells. scPISA combines in vivo microextraction for specific enrichment of target proteins from cells and a state-of-the-art technique called plasmon-enhanced Raman scattering for ultrasensitive detection of low-copy-number proteins. Plasmon-enhanced Raman scattering detection relies on the plasmonic coupling effect (hot-spot) between silver-based plasmonic nanotags and a gold-based extraction microprobe, which dramatically enhances the signal intensity of the surface-enhanced Raman scattering of the nanotags and thereby enables sensitivity at the single-molecule level. scPISA is a straightforward and minimally invasive technique, taking only ~6-15 min (from in vivo extraction to Raman spectrum readout). It is generally applicable to all freely floating intracellular proteins provided that appropriate antibodies or alternatives (for example, molecularly imprinted polymers or aptamers) are available. The entire protocol takes ~4-7 d to complete, including material fabrication, single-cell manipulation, protein labeling, signal acquisition and data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34089021What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.