Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34088880›Full record

ArticleNeurology2021

Implications of FDA Approval of a First Disease-Modifying Therapy for a Neurodegenerative Disease on the Design of Subsequent Clinical Trials.

Joshua D Grill, Jason Karlawish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Modernizing diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: A review of global trends and Asia-specific perspectives.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  7. Five years of the Institute on Methods and Protocols for Advancement of Clinical Trials in ADRD (IMPACT-AD).Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  8. The utility of recruitment incentives in early Alzheimer's disease trials.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Communicating and Using Dementia Risk Evidence.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022
    Article
  11. Alzheimer's disease drug development pipeline: 2022.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joshua D GrillFrom the Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, Departments of Psychiatry and Human Behavior and Neurobiology and Behavior (J.D.G.), University of California, Irvine; and Penn Memory Center, Departments of Medicine, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and Neurology (J.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. jgrill@uci.edu.
Jason KarlawishFrom the Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, Departments of Psychiatry and Human Behavior and Neurobiology and Behavior (J.D.G.), University of California, Irvine; and Penn Memory Center, Departments of Medicine, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and Neurology (J.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

The Alzheimer's Clinical Trial Consortium - Down Syndrome Network (ACTC- DSN)U24AG057437 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Paul S. Aisen, RONALD C PETERSEN · 2018 to 2026
$198.4M
Training Core (I)U54AG063546 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Alexia Mary Torke · 2019 to 2026
$125.9M
UPenn ADCC Biomarker CoreP30AG010124 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DETRE, JOHN A · 1991 to 2020
$35.1M
University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
The Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at the University of California, IrvineP30AG066519 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Elizabeth Head · 2020 to 2026
$27.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010124NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066519NIA NIH HHS U24 AG057437NIA NIH HHS U54 AG063546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of clinical research is to improve clinical practice. In progressive neurodegenerative conditions without any disease-slowing therapies, this will result in eventual approval of a first disease-modifying treatment. Clinical trials will still be needed to discover treatments that are more effective, safer, or more convenient. This will generate controversies over how to design these trials; specifically, controversies about the use of a placebo control. We consider ethical guidance for these studies with attention to 3 designs: placebo-controlled trials in the absence of the new drug, placebo-controlled trials with the approved drug as background therapy, and trials with the new drug as an active control. To understand the practical implications of these designs, we examine experiences in drug development in multiple sclerosis. We conclude by contemplating the future of clinical trials in Alzheimer disease.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesPlacebosResearch DesignUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID34088880
PMCPMC8448555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.