ArticleNeurology2021
Clinical, Imaging, and Pathologic Characteristics of Patients With Right vs Left Hemisphere-Predominant Logopenic Progressive Aphasia.
Article in Neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- FDG-PET in the Evaluation of Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Brain Perfusion, Atrophy, and Dopaminergic Changes in Amyloid Negative Logopenic Primary Progressive Aphasia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Primary progressive aphasia: six questions in search of an answer.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Behavioral and Neuropsychiatric Differences Across Two Atypical Alzheimer's Disease Variants: Logopenic Progressive Aphasia and Posterior Cortical Atrophy.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- Deciphering the clinico-radiological heterogeneity of dysexecutive Alzheimer's disease.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess and compare demographic, clinical, neuroimaging, and pathologic characteristics of a cohort of patients with right hemisphere-predominant vs left hemisphere-predominant logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA).
methodsThis is a case-control study of patients with LPA who were prospectively followed at Mayo Clinic and underwent [
resultsOf 103 prospectively recruited patients with LPA, 8 (4 female) were classified as rLPA (7.8%); all patients with rLPA were right-handed. Patients with rLPA had milder aphasia based on the Western Aphasia Battery-Aphasia Quotient (
conclusionsrLPA is associated with less severe aphasia but has shorter survival from reported symptom onset than typical LPA, possibly related to greater involvement of the nondominant hemisphere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.