Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34088722›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Prognostic Significance of Blood-Based Multi-cancer Detection in Plasma Cell-Free DNA.

Xiaoji Chen, Zhao Dong, Earl Hubbell, Kathryn N Kurtzman, Geoffrey R Oxnard, Oliver Venn, Collin Melton, Christina A Clarke, Rita Shaknovich, Ting Ma and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Late-Stage Outcomes as Surrogates for Mortality in Cancer Screening Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoji ChenGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
Zhao DongGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
Earl HubbellGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7301-3759
Kathryn N KurtzmanGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8673-3413
Geoffrey R OxnardDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Oliver VennGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
Collin MeltonGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
Christina A ClarkeGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
Rita ShaknovichGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
Ting MaGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
Gerry MeixiongGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
Michael V SeidenUS Oncology Research, The Woodlands, Texas.
Eric A KleinGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-1783-0698
Eric T FungGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
Minetta C LiuDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. liu.minetta@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8206-5232
Meta (United States) · USCleveland Clinic · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMayo Clinic · USOpexa Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe recently reported the development of a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) targeted methylation (TM)-based sequencing approach for a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test that includes cancer signal origin prediction. Here, we evaluated the prognostic significance of cancer detection by the MCED test using longitudinal follow-up data. EXPERIMENTAL

designAs part of a Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (CCGA) substudy, plasma cfDNA samples were sequenced using a TM approach, and machine learning classifiers predicted cancer status and cancer signal origin. Overall survival (OS) of cancer participants in the first 3 years of follow-up was evaluated in relation to cancer detection by the MCED test and clinical characteristics.

resultsCancers not detected by the MCED test had significantly better OS (

conclusionsCancer detection by the MCED test was prognostic beyond clinical stage and method of diagnosis. Cancers not detected by the MCED test had better prognosis than cancers detected and SEER-based expected survival. Cancer detection and prognosis may be linked by the underlying biological factor of tumor fraction in cfDNA.

Indexed as

AgedCirculating Tumor DNAEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival RateCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID34088722
PMCPMC9401481
OpenAlexW3165419164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.