Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34088668›Full record

ArticleScience advances2021

Budding yeast relies on G

Deniz Pirincci Ercan, Florine Chrétien, Probir Chakravarty, Helen R Flynn, Ambrosius P Snijders, Frank Uhlmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Polarization as a Process: The Potential of Process Ontology for Understanding Cellular Symmetry Breaking.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Decoding Cdk1 control: from mitotic thresholds to meiotic specificity.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TOR Complex 1: Orchestrating Nutrient Signaling and Cell Cycle Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Cyclin-dependent kinases: Masters of the eukaryotic universe.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Docking to a Basic Helix Promotes Specific Phosphorylation by G1-Cdk1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deniz Pirincci ErcanChromosome Segregation Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5495-2937
Florine ChrétienChromosome Segregation Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4218-1634
Probir ChakravartyBioinformatics and Biostatistics Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1146-8824
Helen R FlynnProteomics Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7002-9130
Ambrosius P SnijdersProteomics Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5416-8592
Frank UhlmannChromosome Segregation Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. frank.uhlmann@crick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3527-6619
The Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15671Wellcome Trust FC001198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two models have been put forward for cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) control of the cell cycle. In the qualitative model, cell cycle events are ordered by distinct substrate specificities of successive cyclin waves. Alternatively, in the quantitative model, the gradual rise of Cdk activity from G

Identifiers

PMID34088668
PMCPMC8177710
OpenAlexW3165332676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.