Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34088595›Full record

ArticleWomen and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives2022

The effects of the COVID 19 pandemic on vaccine decisions in pregnant women.

Hatice Gencer, Sevgi Özkan, Okan Vardar, Pınar Serçekuş

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. COVID-19 Vaccine Literacy Among Black Pregnant and Postpartum Women in the USA.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring social media influences on vaccine decision-making in parents: a netnography.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pregnancy Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Public Health Lens.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hatice GencerPamukkale University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Denizli, Turkey. Electronic address: hgencer@pau.edu.tr.
Sevgi ÖzkanPamukkale University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Denizli, Turkey. Electronic address: sozkan@pau.edu.tr.
Okan VardarPamukkale University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Denizli, Turkey. Electronic address: ovardar@pau.edu.tr.
Pınar SerçekuşPamukkale University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Denizli, Turkey. Electronic address: psercekus@pau.edu.tr.
Pamukkale University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy is an important time for developing attitudes and beliefs about childhood vaccinations. Vaccinations are among the most effective way of preventing some infectious diseases. Discussions on vaccinations have increased due to the Covid-19 pandemic and there is an opportunity to give society correct information on vaccinations.

aimThe aim of the study was to determine the opinions of pregnant women on vaccinations in pregnancy and childhood and the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on these views.

methodsThe study was conducted as a cross-sectional study. The sample included 152 pregnant women. Data were collected through a 25-item online questionnaire created by the researchers.

resultsIt was found in our study that 29.6% of pregnant women using forum websites exhibited hesitant attitudes towards vaccinations. The vaccine hesitancy rate was found to be high in pregnant women who said that their economic level was low and who worried about the risks of vaccination. The Covid-19 pandemic was reported to be the cause of a decrease in vaccine hesitancy in 28.9% of the participants.

conclusionThe events surrounding the pandemic provided an opportunity to explain how pregnant women feel about vaccinations. Providing pregnant women with access to correct information from health workers may reduce the problem of trust, which is among the most important reasons for vaccine hesitancy.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPandemicsPregnancyPregnant PeopleVaccinationVaccinesAcceptabilityCovid-19PandemicPregnancyVaccinationVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID34088595
PMCPMC8133382
OpenAlexW3162172733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.