Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34088517›Full record

ArticleSeminars in oncology2021

Positive attitudes toward clinical trials among military veterans leaves unanswered questions about poor trial accrual.

Grace Clarke Hillyer, Yeun-Hee Anna Park, Ta-Chueh Hsu Rosenberg, Prabhjot Mundi, Imtiaz Patel, Susan E Bates

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Seminars in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grace Clarke HillyerDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY. Electronic address: gah28@cumc.columbia.edu.
Yeun-Hee Anna ParkJames J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Ta-Chueh Hsu RosenbergJames J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Prabhjot MundiJames J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Imtiaz PatelJames J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Susan E BatesHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY; James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
James J. Peters VA Medical Center · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment ProgramP30CA013696 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Anil K Rustgi · 1985 to 2026
$115.3M
Columbia University NCI Community Oncology Research ProgramUG1CA189960 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jennifer E. Amengual, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$12.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013696NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participation in clinical trials is essential to bringing novel and innovative cancer treatments to the bedside but trials that specifically enroll Veterans are relatively few. Given the inherent differences between Veterans and the general United States population, we sought to investigate awareness of and attitudes toward clinical trials among Veterans diagnosed with cancer at a large, urban Veterans Administration Medical Center in Bronx, New York. The survey was administered in 2018-2019. Questions assessed sociodemographic characteristics, health literacy, and general attitudes about clinical trials. Based on key informant interviews, we also inquired about military-specific attitudes. Univariable analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in attitudes by age (<65 v ≥65 years) and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic black v other). Of 115 Veterans approached, 67 (58.3%) completed the survey. Approximately 95% of participants were male, 59.7% were ≥65 years old, and 41.8% were non-Hispanic black. Only 58.2% reported knowing what a clinical trial is but 78.5% of Veterans stated that they trust doctors who do medical research and 87.5% reported they would strongly consider joining a trial if their VA primary care physician recommended it. Many stated that they would be part of a clinical trial if it would help fellow Veterans in the future (93.8%) and would help scientists learn how to treat other Veterans with the same disease (93.8%). Among non-Hispanic black participants, 62.5% agreed that the government has a history of using Veterans in experiments without their knowledge compared to 34.2% of Veterans of other race/ethnicity (P = 0.03). Clearly Veterans in our study were amenable to joining clinical trials. While many are aware of past misconduct in the treatment of military personnel in research, overall attitudes toward clinical trials were favorable and were especially positive when the possibility of improving cancer care for fellow Veterans was considered. In approaching Veterans regarding participation in a clinical trial we recommend education aligned with the literacy level of the Veteran, involvement of the VA primary care provider in clinical trial decisions, and awareness of a Veteran's altruism to help others.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionVeteransAgedClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleOptimismSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsAttitudesCancerClinical trialsMilitary personnelSurveyVeterans

Identifiers

PMID34088517
PMCPMC8530825
OpenAlexW3157178945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.