Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34088363›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2021

Comparative Efficacy of Two Types of Antibiotic Mixtures in Gut Flora Depletion in Female C57BL/6 Mice.

David R Goulding, Page H Myers, Angela B Dickerson, Molly M Comins, Rebecca A Wiltshire, Terry L Blankenship-Paris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Assessing multiple factors affecting the gut microbiome structure of very preterm infants.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David R GouldingVeterinary Medicine Section, Comparative Medicine Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Page H MyersVeterinary Medicine Section, Comparative Medicine Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Angela B DickersonVeterinary Medicine Section, Comparative Medicine Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Molly M CominsVeterinary Medicine Section, Comparative Medicine Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Rebecca A WiltshireVeterinary Medicine Section, Comparative Medicine Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Terry L Blankenship-ParisVeterinary Medicine Section, Comparative Medicine Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;, Email: blanken1@niehs.nih.gov.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

Animal Refinement for Laboratory RodentsZIAES102825 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BLANKENSHIP-PARIS, TERRY · 2010 to 2023
$10.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, interest in the role of the microbiome in health and disease has increased. The use of germ-free animals and depletion of the microbial flora using antimicrobials are 2 methods commonly used to study the microbiome in laboratory mice. Germ-free mice are born, raised, and studied in isolators in the absence of any known microbes; however, the equipment, supplies, and training required for the use of these mice can be costly and time-consuming. The use of antibiotics to decrease the microbial flora does not require special equipment, can be used for any mouse strain, and is relatively inexpensive; however, mice treated in this manner still retain microbes and they do not live in a germ-free environment. One commonly used antibiotic cocktail regimen uses ampicillin, neomycin, metronidazole, and vancomycin in the drinking water for 2 to 4 wk. We found that the palatability of this mixture is low, resulting in weight loss and leading to removal of mice from the study. The addition of sucralose to the medicated water and making wet food (mash) with the medicated water improved intake; however, the low palatability still resulted in a high number of mice requiring removal. The current study evaluated a new combination of antibiotics designed to reduce the gut microbiota while maintaining body weights. C57BL/6NCrl mice were placed on one of the following drinking water regimens: ampicillin/neomycin/metronidazole/vancomycin water (

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAmpicillinAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFecesFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34088363
PMCPMC8223868
OpenAlexW3164721459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.