Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34088335›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

Collective Critical Care Ambulance: an innovative transportation of critical care patients by bus in COVID-19 pandemic response.

Thierry Lentz, Charles Groizard, Abel Colomes, Anna Ozguler, Michel Baer, Thomas Loeb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Effect of a prioritization score on the inter-hospital transfer time management of severe COVID-19 patients: a quasi-experimental intervention study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thierry LentzSAMU des Hauts-de-Seine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104, boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92 380, Garches, France.
Charles GroizardSAMU des Hauts-de-Seine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104, boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92 380, Garches, France.
Abel ColomesSAMU des Hauts-de-Seine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104, boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92 380, Garches, France.
Anna OzgulerSAMU des Hauts-de-Seine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104, boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92 380, Garches, France. anna.ozguler@aphp.fr.
Michel BaerSAMU des Hauts-de-Seine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104, boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92 380, Garches, France.
Thomas LoebSAMU des Hauts-de-Seine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104, boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92 380, Garches, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, as the number of available Intensive Care beds in France did not meet the needs, it appeared necessary to transfer a large number of patients from the most affected areas to the less ones. Mass transportation resources were deemed necessary. To achieve that goal, the concept of a Collective Critical Care Ambulance (CCCA) was proposed in the form of a long-distance bus re-designed and equipped to accommodate up to six intensive care patients and allow Advanced Life Support (ALS) techniques to be performed while en route.

methodsThe expected benefit of the CCCA, when compared to ALS ambulances accommodating a single patient, was to reduce the resources requirements, in particular by a lower personnel headcount for several patients being transferred to the same destination. A foreseen prospect, comparing to other collective transportation vectors such as airplanes, was the door-to-door capability, minimalizing patients' handovers for safety concerns and time efficiency. With the project of a short-distance transfer of several Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients together, the opportunity came to test the CCCA under real-life conditions and evaluate safely its technical feasibility and impact in time and resources saving, before it could be proposed for longer distances.

resultsFour COVID-19 patients were transported over 37 km. All patients were intubated and under controlled ventilation. One of them was under Norepinephrine support. Mean loading time was 1 min 39 s. Transportation time was 29 min. At destination, the mean unloading time was 1 min 15 s. No serious adverse effect, in particular regarding hemodynamic instability or ventilation disorder, has been observed. No harmful incident has occurred.

conclusionsIt was a very instructive test. Collective medical evacuation by bus for critically ill patients under controlled ventilation is suitable and easy to implement. Design, ALS equipment, power autonomy, safety and resources saving, open the way for carrying up to 6 ICU-patients over a long distance. The CCCA could bring a real added-value in an epidemic context and could also be helpful in many other events generating multiple victims such as an armed conflict, a terrorist attack or a natural disaster.

Indexed as

AmbulancesCOVID-19Critical CareFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2Collective transportCritical care transportDisasterEmergency medical serviceInterhospital transfer of critically ill patientsMass casualty incidents

Identifiers

PMID34088335
PMCPMC8177260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.