Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34088324›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2021

Lymphocyte-monocyte-neutrophil index: a predictor of severity of coronavirus disease 2019 patients produced by sparse principal component analysis.

Yingjie Qi, Jian-An Jia, Huiming Li, Nagen Wan, Shuqin Zhang, Xiaoling Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Role of Innate and Adaptive Cytokines in the Survival of COVID-19 Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yingjie Qi *The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital Infection Hospital), Susong Road 218#, Hefei, 230022, Anhui Province, China.
Jian-An Jia *Department of Laboratory Medicine, The 901Th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Hefei, 230031, Anhui, China.
Huiming Li *Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Nagen Wan *Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Shuqin Zhang *Centre for Computational Systems Biology, School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Xiaoling Ma *The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital Infection Hospital), Susong Road 218#, Hefei, 230022, Anhui Province, China. maxiaoling@ustc.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China YD9110002001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is important to recognize the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in severe conditions from moderate ones, thus more effective predictors should be developed.

methodsClinical indicators of COVID-19 patients from two independent cohorts (Training data: Hefei Cohort, 82 patients; Validation data: Nanchang Cohort, 169 patients) were retrospected. Sparse principal component analysis (SPCA) using Hefei Cohort was performed and prediction models were deduced. Prediction results were evaluated by receiver operator characteristic curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) in above two cohorts.

resultsSPCA using Hefei Cohort revealed that the first 13 principal components (PCs) account for 80.8% of the total variance of original data. The PC1 and PC12 were significantly associated with disease severity with odds ratio of 4.049 and 3.318, respectively. They were used to construct prediction model, named Model-A. In disease severity prediction, Model-A gave the best prediction efficiency with area under curve (AUC) of 0.867 and 0.835 in Hefei and Nanchang Cohort, respectively. Model-A's simplified version, named as LMN index, gave comparable prediction efficiency as classical clinical markers with AUC of 0.837 and 0.800 in training and validation cohort, respectively. According to DCA, Model-A gave slightly better performance than others and LMN index showed similar performance as albumin or neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

conclusionsPrediction models produced by SPCA showed robust disease severity prediction efficiency for COVID-19 patients and have the potential for clinical application.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultAgedBiomarkersCOVID-19FemaleHumansLeukocyte CountLymphocyte CountLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMonocytesNeutrophilsPrincipal Component AnalysisBiomarkersCOVID-19PredictionPrincipal component analysisSARS-CoV-2Severity

Identifiers

PMID34088324
PMCPMC8176446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.