ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2022
Resident Macrophages and Their Potential in Cardiac Tissue Engineering.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- The roles of the microtubule cytoskeletal network in cardiac mechanobiology.Journal of cell science · 2026Review
- Cardiac resident macrophages: the emerging role in arrhythmogenesis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Regional and cell specific bioactivity of injectable extracellular matrix biomaterials in myocardial infarction.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Electrically conductive biopolymer-based hydrogels and fibrous materials fabricated using 3D printing and electrospinning for cardiac tissue engineering.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Engineering multifunctional surface topography to regulate multiple biological responses.Biomaterials · 2025Review
- Exosomes and MicroRNAs: key modulators of macrophage polarization in sepsis pathophysiology.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- The efferocytosis process in aging: Supporting evidence, mechanisms, and therapeutic prospects for age-related diseases.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Macrophage regulation in vascularization upon regeneration and repair of tissue injury and engineered organ transplantation.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Molecular convergence of risk variants for congenital heart defects leveraging a regulatory map of the human fetal heart.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Loss of synovial tissue macrophage homeostasis precedes rheumatoid arthritis clinical onset.Science advances · 2024Article
- At the heart of inflammation: Unravelling cardiac resident macrophage biology.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Macrophages enhance contractile force in iPSC-derived human engineered cardiac tissue.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Cardiac resident macrophages: Spatiotemporal distribution, development, physiological functions, and their translational potential on cardiac diseases.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024Review
- The new era of cardiovascular research: revolutionizing cardiovascular research with 3D models in a dish.Medical review (2021) · 2024Review
- Macrophage-based therapeutic approaches for cardiovascular diseases.Basic research in cardiology · 2024Review
- Macrophage variants in laboratory research: most are well done, but some are RAW.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Review
- Control of the post-infarct immune microenvironment through biotherapeutic and biomaterial-based approaches.Drug delivery and translational research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many facets of tissue engineered models aim at understanding cellular mechanisms to recapitulate
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.