Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34088121›Full record

ReviewThe Science of the total environment2021

Environmental externalities of the COVID-19 lockdown: Insights for sustainability planning in the Anthropocene.

Rubel Biswas Chowdhury, Ayushi Khan, Tashfia Mahiat, Hillol Dutta, Tahana Tasmeea, Afra Bashira Binth Arman, Farzin Fardu, Bidhan Bhuson Roy, Mohammad Mosharraf Hossain, Niaz Ahmed Khan and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Science of the total environment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Design and management considerations for the Kenya-Tanzania marine transboundary conservation area.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rubel Biswas ChowdhurySchool of Engineering, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia. Electronic address: rubel.c@deakin.edu.au.
Ayushi KhanDepartment of Environmental Science and Management, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tashfia MahiatDepartment of Environmental Science and Management, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Hillol DuttaDepartment of Geography, Clark University, USA.
Tahana TasmeeaDepartment of Environmental Science and Management, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Afra Bashira Binth ArmanDepartment of Environmental Science and Management, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Farzin FarduDepartment of Environmental Science and Management, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Bidhan Bhuson RoyDepartment of Environmental Science and Management, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh; Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, Canada.
Mohammad Mosharraf HossainInstitute of Forestry and Environmental Science, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Niaz Ahmed KhanDepartment of Development Studies, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh; Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB), Bashundhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
A T M Nurul AminDepartment of Economics and Social Sciences, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad SujauddinDepartment of Environmental Science and Management, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Electronic address: mohammad.sujauddin@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has abruptly halted the Anthropocene's ever-expanding reign for the time being. The resulting global human confinement, dubbed as the Anthropause, has created an unprecedented opportunity for us to evaluate the environmental consequences of large-scale changes in anthropogenic activities. Based on a methodical and in-depth review of related literature, this study critically evaluates the positive and negative externalities of COVID-19 induced lockdown on environmental components including air, water, noise, waste, forest, wildlife, and biodiversity. Among adverse impacts of the lockdown, increased amount of healthcare waste (300-400%), increased level of atmospheric ozone (30-300%), elevated levels of illicit felling in forests and wildlife poaching were prominent. Compared to the negative impacts, significant positive changes in various quality parameters related to key environmental components were evident. Positive impacts on air quality, water quality, noise level, waste generation, and wildlife were apparent in varying degrees as evaluated in this study. By presenting a critical overview of the recommendations given in the major literature in light of these documented impacts, this paper alludes to potential policy reforms as a guideline for future sustainable environmental management planning. Some of the key recommendations are e.g., enhance remote working facilities, cleaner design, use of internet of things, automation, systematic lockdown, and inclusion of hazardous waste management in disaster planning. The summarized lessons of this review, pertinent to the dynamic relationship between anthropogenic activities and environmental degradation, amply bring home the need for policy reforms and prioritization of Sustainable Development Goals in the context of the planetary boundaries to the environmental sustainability for a new post-pandemic world.

Indexed as

Air PollutionCOVID-19Communicable Disease ControlEnvironmental MonitoringHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2AnthropauseCOVID-19Ecological impactsEnvironmental pollutionEnvironmental sustainabilityLockdownSDGs

Identifiers

PMID34088121
PMCPMC9616981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.