ArticleBrain and behavior2021
A survey on doctors' cognition of depression in patients with epilepsy.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A survey on doctors' cognition of depression in patients with epilepsy.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis survey aimed to assess doctors' cognition on depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy in Shanghai China.
methodsQuestionnaires were handed out to doctors who have taken part in the epilepsy care, covering those from all third-grade hospitals and several second-grade hospitals in Shanghai China. Respondents were asked to make choices for their demographic profiles, clinical practices, acquired knowledge of, and attitudes toward the comorbidity of epilepsy and depression.
resultsA total of 282 questionnaires were collected from 16 hospitals in Shanghai China, of which 280 copies were included in the statistical analysis. Respondents were mainly less than 50 years (260, 92.8%), mostly residents and attendings (206, 73.6%), and mostly master and doctor's degrees (225, 80.3%). The ratio of epileptologists and nonepileptologists was 56 (20.1%):224 (79.9%). Compared to nonepileptologists and residents, epileptologists and doctors with higher professional titles were more likely to answer that they received a higher percentage of patients with the comorbidity of epilepsy and depression (≥30%), and they knew very well about the knowledge, and held the view that depression exacerbated seizures (p < .05). Surprisingly, most doctors including chief doctors and epileptologists answered that they had difficulties in prescribing antidepressants. Quite a few doctors from lower class hospitals even preferred to use tricyclic antidepressants for controlling depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: Doctors, especially younger doctors and nonepileptologists, need more training to get knowledge of the comorbidity of epilepsy and depression. However, the therapeutic methods for depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy were still limited and in a challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.