Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34087915›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2021

Personalized ß-lactam dosing in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pneumonia: A retrospective analysis on pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic target attainment.

Ute Chiriac, Otto R Frey, Anka C Roehr, Andreas Koeberer, Patrick Gronau, Thomas Fuchs, Jason A Roberts, Alexander Brinkmann

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Ute ChiriacDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Heidelberg.ORCID 0000-0002-4288-1745
Otto R FreyDepartment of Pharmacy, Heidenheim General Hospital.
Anka C RoehrDepartment of Pharmacy, Heidenheim General Hospital.
Andreas KoebererDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heidenheim General Hospital.
Patrick GronauDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heidenheim General Hospital.
Thomas FuchsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heidenheim General, Heidenheim, Germany.
Jason A RobertsUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland.
Alexander BrinkmannDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heidenheim General Hospital.
S.P.E.C.I.E.S. · USHeidelberg University · DEThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractPathophysiological changes are important risk factors for critically ill patients with pneumonia manifesting sub-therapeutic antibiotic exposures during empirical treatment. The effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on antibiotic dosing requirements is uncertain. We aimed to determine the effect of COVID-19 on ß-lactam pharmacokinetics (PK) and PK target attainment in critically ill patients with a personalized dosing strategy.Retrospective, single-center analysis of COVID-19 ± critically ill patients with pneumonia (community-acquired pneumonia or hospital-acquired pneumonia) who received continuous infusion of a ß-lactam antibiotic with dosing personalized through dosing software and therapeutic drug monitoring. A therapeutic exposure was defined as serum concentration between (css) 4 to 8 times the EUCAST non-species related breakpoint).Data from 58 patients with pneumonia was analyzed. Nineteen patients were tested COVID-19-positive before the start of the antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia or hospital-acquired pneumonia. Therapeutic exposure was achieved in 71% of COVID-19 patients (68% considering all patients). All patients demonstrated css above the non-species-related breakpoint. Twenty percent exceeded css above the target range (24% of all patients). The median ß-lactam clearance was 49% compared to ß-lactam clearance in a standard patient without a significant difference regarding antibiotic, time of sampling or present COVID-19 infection. Median daily doses were 50% lower compared to standard bolus dosing.COVID-19 did not significantly affect ß-lactam pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. Personalized ß-lactam dosing strategies were safe in critically ill patients and lead to high PK target attainment with less resources.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAgedAged, 80 and overbeta-LactamsBody Mass IndexCritical IllnessDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2beta-Lactams

Identifiers

PMID34087915
PMCPMC8183774
OpenAlexW3164092603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.