ArticleMedicine2021
Appraisal of transthoracic echocardiography for opportunistic screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAbdominal aortic aneurysm is a life threatening disease. Most of the patients diagnosed incidentally because of the asymptomatic nature of this disease. This study aimed to determine the frequency of abdominal aortic aneurysm and evaluate the value of opportunistic screening during transthoracic echocardiography.A total of 5138 patients referred for echocardiographic evaluation for any reason were screened for abdominal aortic aneurysm between November 2014 to July 2019. The aneurysm was defined as an abdominal aorta with a diameter greater than 30 mm, or segmental dilatation of more than 50% of its size in non-dilated parts.The overall frequency of abdominal aortic aneurysm was 2.2% (n = 109) in the study population. Male sex (P < .001), older age (P < .001), presence of diastolic dysfunction (P = .036), hypertension (P < .001), coronary artery disease (P < .001), and hyperlipidemia (P < .001) were associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Patients with aneurysm had significantly increased diameters of the aortic trunk (P < .001) and ascending aorta (P < .001), significantly thicker interventricular septum (P < .001) and posterior wall (P < .001), significantly increased end-diastolic diameter (P < .001) and enlarged left atrium (P < .001), and significantly decreased ejection fraction (P < .001). The mostly met criteria for screening abdominal aortic aneurysm in international guidelines was the age of the patients.Based on the results of this study, screening patients over 60 years of age who undergo a transthoracic echocardiography for any reason would be beneficial to detect an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm in Turkish population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.